View Single Post
  #3  
Old January 12th, 2006
jome jome is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 1,211
Rep Power: 157
jome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputationjome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputationjome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputationjome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputationjome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputationjome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputationjome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputationjome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputationjome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputationjome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputationjome no shame in showing off that warm and fuzzy reputation
Send a message via MSN to jome Send a message via Skype™ to jome
Re: dry training and hyperventelation

Personally I think training effect vise the most beneficial is not hyperventilating for several reasons. The biggest being that you can reach much lower O2 saturations without it before passing out (bohr effect etc) and it would make sense that it also thus rewards the most training response and adaptation. It's also mentally more demanding, thus effectively teaching that aspect of apnea as well.

Dry training is great for experimenting with the amount of hyperventilating that offers the most benefit. If you don't know you "optimum breathup", I would keep a diary of attempts and try different kind of ventilation strategies in between absolutely no breathup and mild hyperventilation (personally I regard 10x5:0:10 maximum, after that I start to get clear symptoms of ventilating too much. Optimum for me seem around 5x5:0:10). It's relatively safe to make such experiments, but I would still encourage using common sense and not attempting huge leaps or extreme hyperventilation. And it never hurts to at least have someone aware that you're doing breath holds...
__________________
Simo K

Last edited by jome; January 12th, 2006 at 18:45.
Reply With Quote