View Single Post
  #54  
Old October 8th, 2007
glennv's Avatar
glennv glennv is offline
hybrid lifeform
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Amsterdam , Netherlands
Posts: 354
Rep Power: 20
glennv has legions of little leprechauns trying to steal that reputationglennv has legions of little leprechauns trying to steal that reputationglennv has legions of little leprechauns trying to steal that reputationglennv has legions of little leprechauns trying to steal that reputationglennv has legions of little leprechauns trying to steal that reputationglennv has legions of little leprechauns trying to steal that reputationglennv has legions of little leprechauns trying to steal that reputationglennv has legions of little leprechauns trying to steal that reputationglennv has legions of little leprechauns trying to steal that reputationglennv has legions of little leprechauns trying to steal that reputation
Re: [Article] Martin Stepanek: It's Not About Me

With all this depth measuring problems and unfair tag/lanyard/longer fingernails/linestretch etc advantage, wouldn't it make more sense to say that a new WR has to be at least 5 m deeper then the old one. Who says 1 meter is the holy number.
I never liked this 1 meter crap world records (no offence there of course for the total depth).
Like winning on points in boxing. Always disputes and problems with this. Go for a knockout. Nobody will dispute that.
Same for static . Not 1 second but minimum 10 seconds or so. Dynamic 5 meters sounds fine to me. Then you can also drop the rules about grabbing and touching the bottom , because you will never get 5 meters unfair advantage (if any) from that.

So unless we get nanometer precise electronic measuring equipment like in athletics or swimming with the electronic touch plates, lets make it simpler.
__________________
Greet,

GlennV
Apnea Team Amsterdam / ATA forum
Reply With Quote