View Single Post
  #5  
Old March 16th, 2008
TheDude's Avatar
TheDude TheDude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 13
TheDude will become famous soon enoughTheDude will become famous soon enoughTheDude will become famous soon enoughTheDude will become famous soon enoughTheDude will become famous soon enoughTheDude will become famous soon enoughTheDude will become famous soon enoughTheDude will become famous soon enough
Send a message via ICQ to TheDude
Re: Mares Nemo Apneist vs. D3

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanso View Post
IIRC, the Nemo only has a sample frequency of 0.5Hz, one sample every two seconds, that is not enough for me.
Where did you find the data on the sample frequency? The rate at which it stores depth for the profile is 1s on the Apneist. I'm not sure though which rate you mean.

For the rate at which the sensor reads the depth, which I think is more important than how frequently it stores it for the profile, from my testing, comparing the Nemo with Mosquito (same hardware as D3), the suunto was lagging behind. Meaning if you went down fast and swept your hand down, and go up, than the Nemo recorded a few cm more depth. If you went down and spend a few seconds there, the readings were equal.

But unfortunately you don't find the 'speed' of the sensor in any tech info... I think except the F1/X1
__________________
Seen the Arch...
www.freediving.sk
Reply With Quote