View Single Post
  #8  
Old April 28th, 2008
onefish onefish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NT Australia
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 24
onefish has a spectacular auraonefish has a spectacular auraonefish has a spectacular auraonefish has a spectacular auraonefish has a spectacular auraonefish has a spectacular auraonefish has a spectacular auraonefish has a spectacular auraonefish has a spectacular auraonefish has a spectacular auraonefish has a spectacular aura
Re: Smaller Guns / Reasonable Power

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtkwest View Post
in my opinion,(just an opinion ) based on my experience, gus shorter than 42 inch are useless. it is too hard to get close enough to spooky fish, with smaller guns. plus there isnt enogh barrel lenth to have more than 6 or 8 inces of band stretch, (if you subtract the slack bands position from length of barrel(measured to notches)) you only get like 5 inches of stretch or so on a 36 inch ab biller, for instance, and a 24 inch is more of a toy than anything else. pneumatics are probably the way to go on little guns, if you must use one. the mass of spear is still an issue. also with these little guns, you end up wounding fish, but not keeping it, which is kinda uncool, in a way.
You are correct about band guns, we were discussing smaller pneumatics. An interesting statistic. 17-4ph stainless steel is roughly 45% the weight of Tungsten. this means that a 50cm tungsten spear would weigh roughly the same amount as a 111cm SS spear of the same diameter.

Cheers,
TJ
Reply With Quote