|
|
|||||||
| Notices | |
| General Freediving General discussion on Freediving. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tom Sietas has a new world record for static on pure O2 of 14:15.
http://www.tomsietas.com/indexE.html Lucia
__________________
Lucia |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
This news is not really new, isn't it?
Seriously, I'm waiting for the internet version of the show. I think this time Bon Jovi was not there (fortunately |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I thought Pelizzari had managed 20 mins?
__________________
Ben Gowland - UK Freedivers website |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I'll be the first to admit that I don't follow this sort of thing, but my initial reaction is WHO CARES?
Its a gimmick using 100% 02. If we aren't going to use natural air, why pick 100% 02? We could also keep records for 25% 02, 50% 02, 75% 02, etc. Then if someone breaks your record for, say, 50%, you could always just change to 48% or 52% to set a new record. I'm reminded of Pipin when he set a new record for depth using just one breath from a scuba tank and justified it by saying that the event was "no limits." How many breaths does it take before its scuba diving?
__________________
wsbhtr@cox.net |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Lucia |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I've heard master Pelizzari did perhaps 18min? 15min? Iám not sure, but they saz, he said, he could have done further, just he didnát feel air hunger, so he stopped (it was a totallz unknown teritorz for him ü as I think for almost all of us).
Also as I've heard Tom did much more on training (with O2). I don't agree with you Bill. If it would be somebodz unknown, I would say, perhaps zou are right, but we are talking about the official static (not pure O2) world record holder. So this is another case, I think. I could also imagine, that somehow this could be the part of his (Tom) static trainings (reaching for the magic 10).. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Here in Vancouver several of us were theorizing how training on 100% O2 could improve your normal O2 static. The idea is that with 100% O2 you can tolerate a FAR higher CO2 level, much as occurs during a deep water 'hang.' As such your CO2 tolerance increases dramatically by doing this sort of static.
__________________
Eric Fattah Canada http://www.liquivision.ca "I encourage you to be free in the way you measure your success. I don’t claim to know what it will be like to be in your position, but I know that when you leave here, grades will be handed out differently. Your ability to gauge your success will largely depend on how you perceive it. You can shape it, set it up, feel it, and define it. Allow competition to turn inward. Do not depend on awards, money, or other validations." -Jonny Moseley |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Just wanted to say in case anyone tries that (pure o2 as tolerance training) that be very VERY careful. Co2 narcosis and respiratory acidosis are not something to be taken lightly...I've heard a very chilling first person account of such an incident, and it was not funny. You don't necessarily come around from a hypercapnic blackout the same way you do from a hypoxic one. I'm sure Eric and other experienced divers reading this are aware of that, but some might not be.
I recommend against O2 statics all together, but if someone does go on and try it (and there's always people who will), please start with very conservative results, only topping your "air pb", by very small increments.
__________________
Simo K Last edited by jome; January 27th, 2006 at 13:35. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
man that must be
A) boring as hell due to lenght B) must suck in terms of contractions. remember people your body doesnt sense how much oxygen you have, but how much CO2. higher concentration of Oxygen means at end of your dive dont expect 30% CO@ (the rest is nitrogen) but more like 95% or something. ouch.
__________________
"Enzo: Hey, do you have any more complaints? Just make a list and we'll stick it on the porthole, OK!?" |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Perhaps it depends on various factors ? I remember Tom at his first O2-attempt saying that the contractions were awful. Veronika Last edited by Veronika; February 1st, 2006 at 16:55. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
It's not just high co2 that triggers contractions/breathing reflex. Like Veronika suggests, it's ultimately more complicated than that. I believe that the low o2 receptors (or what ever, chemoreceptors?) only activate when the oxygen level reaches a pretty low level, so with pure O2 they never activate and you get these kind of half-contractions or whatever...But on a normal static, for the last minute or so, you feel the combined effect of high co2 and low o2. Towards the end of a maximum static I get what I call "hypoxic contractions" (for the lack of a better term), which compared to the co2 ones are much uglier and ultimately determine the break point. The CO2 contractions you can learn to ignore and tolerate pretty well...
I haven't tried my self, but having talked with some people who have tried pure o2, they describe it as something like "you get contractions, but they just don't feel bad"...
__________________
Simo K Last edited by jome; February 2nd, 2006 at 06:34. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Lucia |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
1.) OxTox (Bert Effect) due to increased ppO2. -> potential to get convulsions underwater 2.) OxTox (Smith Effect) if exposed to O2 for longer periods of time -> you basically ruin your lung + to my understanding: 3.) highly (!) increased probability of BO due to minimal CO2 levels at start of apnea Just a few thoughts. Last edited by Veronika; February 3rd, 2006 at 09:07. |