|
|
|||||||
| Notices | |
| General Freediving General discussion on Freediving. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Fiona is a case in point. She broke the World Record but the rules robbed her of it because of judges being the wrong Nationality etc etc. Nothing to do with the performance but everything wrong with the person who drafted the rules. Whearas a 'foreign' athelete doing the same event at the same time alongside Fiona and using Fionas judges, and doing a shorter distance would have the world record. It wasnt a matter that Fiona didnt have a drugs test, I am sure she would have had one, if there was any point.
World Records only in a competition sounds ideal. But the big issue then will be Aida accepting the quality of the competition. Remember the Swiss debacle at the Dolphins comp? One year its Aida recognised, the next its not. Yet the judges were World Class Heimo Henke and I believe a previous Aida president and someone else, I cant remember (all were Aida recognised judges). In that comp Stephane broke the Aida World Record DWF (but was robbed by the rules of Aida) because they no longer sanctioned that comp. Those same judges gave my dwf a white card, but the rules robbed me of a National record. (funnily, had English judges of been there, it would have counted) but in those early days, the English judges were just inexperienced athletes, like me, that had judged once or twice before) far less experienced than Heimo etc. This is why I say that records made in high profile International standard competitions should be recognised. Records attempted like Jorg suggests should also be recognised assuming they are judged and doped etc (the point being, the judges need not be Aida members if they are of equivalent experience or follow equivalent protocols. |
|
#92
|
||||
|
||||
if you are ready to beat a current world record, you can go to a comp with wr-status. or you can ask the organizer to arrange this status for you.
now it is 2007. your example was in 2002(?). we have a complete new member board. forget the snow from the last winter. stephane is blaming ourselves. I`am really furious about this. greetings, wolle Last edited by wolleneugebauer; July 17th, 2007 at 10:07. |
|
#93
|
||||
|
||||
Competitions are important I am sure but why would you want to limit records to comps. only? That sounds like an insane idea to me. Comps. are not what get the attention to freediving. It is the personalities that are put in a situation where they can fully test themselves against the current records, there own ability, and the ocean itself.
Many of you have made the point that in a competition you only get one attempt. Well why does that make a record more valid? I think a record should reflect human potential. We should allow the athlete to perform to the best they are capable of, not just the best they managed in that particular competition final.
__________________
"you can't untell a tale, you can't out slow a snail" |
|
#94
|
||||
|
||||
Haydn, is it really so difficult to understand that for getting a World Record certified, you have to fulfil conditions applicable to World Records? If the above mentioned competitors choose not to endure the WR conditions it was clearly their voluntery intention, and there is no reason why the condtions should be changed because of them. With your demand you are actually telling that the WR conditions are worthless and that WR should be allowed under the same conditions as NR - judges may be of the same nationality or even friends, no stricter controls, possibly no doping control (not in this case though), etc. I do not understand that you do not realize that it is nonsense. If it is so we can right abolish AIDA and tell that any performance is an official WR automatically, regardless of the conditions it was made under. What's so bad on having a NR higher than WR?
|
|
#95
|
||||
|
||||
I agree 100% with Trux. You have to have rules and they have to be adhered to. If athletes don't like the current rules then make moves to change them before the attempt, if they can get enough AIDA members to agree. What you cannot do is change the rules to suit an athlete after the performance.
If Fiona's record attempt had followed the world record rules a dope testing kit would have been available on site and the Judges would have been the right nationality. Mistakes could still have been made by the Judges but if every thing was done correctly it would have been a world record. This assumes that funds were available to pay for doping kits, judges etc. If funds are not available then you get an AIDA National record that some may call an unofficial world record. |
|
#96
|
||||
|
||||
Doping kits are just a waste of money... I'm working on a pretty disturbing article as we speak about doping. Crazy stuff... Conclusion for freediving is that doping tests are worthless the way we are doing them, but I guess that is not a big surprise. It's just an image thing...
__________________
Jorg Jansen - Eindhoven, The Netherlands Mobile: +31634027003 For all freediving related news follow @sharkfreediving on twitter. If you have any (national) freediving related news tweet me or txt/call me on my mobile!
|
|
#97
|
||||
|
||||
Actually doping is worthless in most (if not all) sports. Just look at the cyclists. How the f** can you go through tour the France if you are not doped (ok thats a personal opinion)? But as we heard in the last months testimonies of some world class cyclists we could easily conclude almost every pro is doped. If somebody says "i doped because i knew there is no chance they can catch me" this should be enough words for the whole system. Doping tests should be done when training and not after the comp.
And i'm sure there is doping present in freediving.
__________________
At this point in time U'd wish U were a tiny little fish... blub blub |
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
The 2002 example was a long time ago and things have improved immensely, its just that Aida as THE World authority for freediving are innacurate to call a person a World Record holder when they blatantly are not, especially when they accept that a National record is greater. Surely its commonsense to accept that the person with the National record is the true World Record holder. The only thing that some people have mentioned, relates to a couple of spurious rules (nationality of judges etc) that cause the new record to be devalued to something less. Its this emphasis on the rules that you seem to prefer, rather than the empasis on the performance.
I reckon, we all agree that Stephane has smashed the World Record, but for the fact that his very experienced Aida judges were the wrong Nationality, that somehow suggests that his performance was not as good enough to be ratified. The conditions that govern World Records should be more relevant to the performance . It is clear his performance was good enough. What wasnt good enough, is the rules that caused such unfairness in the first place. I am all for changing the rules in this respect. We have a World Record performance and we are relegating it to a National record. Thats a disgrace. We should be singing it from the roof tops. Frankly, its no wonder that one by one, the worlds best freedivers are dis illusioned and go their own way. And that too, is a disgrace. Just imagine if the next world championships included Stephane, Umberto, Patrick, Pippin (how many more should I miss out). Its all about drafting rules that are inclusive and not exclusive. This is the responbsibility of the Worlds premier freediving organisation, Aida. Great discussion guys. I promise not take the contrary view on the next thread. |
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Hadyn
Stephane and Patrick may be valid examples of top level peple who have for one reason or another fallen out with AIDA. Pipin does not compete any more nor does Umberto. I know in his day Pipin had problems with Aida but he was in charge of a rival association for recording record IAFD. Umberto has his own Apnea academy but I dont know that he had a major problem with Aida? Maybe I am wrong about Umberto but I never heard anything about it. Surely there is a problem with claiming a WR with national judges there is a clear conflict of intrest. Are you are argueing maybe because you have known and seen past perfromances from Stephane and respect him as do I. There is no AIDA judges in Ireland at present, if I train to be a judge and show you a video of an unknown from Ireland doing 11 mins static and I pronounce this as a wr will you accept it? ( i know this is a slightly extreme example) or what other protocols will I need to have in place? |
|
#100
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In Stephan's case it was a clear and intentional provocation not to follow the international rules and claiming WR despite it - it was a choice, not an accident. I let aside if his anger toward AIDA is justified or not, but it does not change anything on the fact that he chose intentionally and voluntarily not to be the official AIDA WR holder, but rather just a NR holder, and claiming the WR despite it. In this case he is at least right that his attempt was the best NR performance, unlike at his last DNF NR where he claimed a "world record" with his 213m despite of a higher existing NR of 215m of Tom Sietas. The conclusion is - there is absolutely nothing wrong with the current WR rules, there is only a problem with certain egos not being able to bend to the rules. Last edited by trux; July 17th, 2007 at 12:25. Reason: spelling |
|
#102
|
||||
|
||||
... and showed directly after his surfacing a big picture with "record du monde" and sent a press release with the new world record???
|
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
If he did that ...it's really a bad thing to do.
Why didn't he just invite AIDA judges and made an official WR attempt?Then no one could question his WR......
__________________
Alex |
|
#104
|
||||
|
||||
It was a question. I was not there.
But I saw many newsticker and the video at channel tf1 in the french tv. I cant believe that is comming without assistance from stephane. |