|
|
|||||||
| Notices | |
| Regulations and Conservation Discuss Hunting Regulations and Conservation in here |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#166
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I can't catch enough to keep the family in fish, let alone others. Catching, preparing and eating fresh fish though has given the family a greater appreciation and knowledge of sea food. We depend on the local fishmonger to keep us going though, the weekly mackeral, occasional herring, sardines, etc. (we avoid cod, although occasionally have haddock). In fact, we buy more fresh fish since I've been spearing than we ever did beforeLast edited by Mr. X; July 12th, 2008 at 14:48. |
|
#167
|
||||
|
||||
None of the fish from the local fishmonger have funny holes thru them do they??
![]()
__________________
Stay safe, Gutshot |
|
#168
|
|||
|
|||
Just received this reply a few mins ago after doing a few resends. So it's a vote from us up here in the North West this time. Will ask to be kept informed of the EU timetable for their action from now on with a particular eye on their EUR-lex system for THE amended proposal. ************************************************** ********************** Thank you for taking the time and trouble to contact Mr Sajjad Karim MEP in relation to your concerns about the Proposal for a Council Regulation concerning the conservation of fisheries resources through technical measure and the implication this may have on the recreational spearfishing in the European fisheries area of the North Atlantic. I have been made aware from other MEPs assistants that many people are contacting MEPs in relation to the possible implications of Article 31. I have been informed by my colleague that he contacted the Commission’s Department of Maritime Affairs (DG MARE) regarding the proposed changes to the Technical Conservation Regulations; to which he received the following reply: “The Commission tried to prepare a new simplified and clarified proposal on technical measures, in the structure and also in articles. On your point (Spearfishing-the point my colleague raised) we must check on what is a projectile. However, we can confirm that it is not the intention of the Commission to prohibit recreational spearfishing. If not clarified already, the article concerned with be corrected and clarified later during the discussions”. Consequently, I am of the general understanding that you do not have cause for too much concern as it would appear that the necessary rectification will be made here. I hope that you find this somewhat reassuring. With kindest regards Lucy Pickles Assistant to Sajjad Karim MEP Conservative Member of the European Parliament Representing the North West Tel: 0161 860 7572 Fax: 0161 860 7582 Email: info@sajjadkarim.eu Website: Sajjad Karim P SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary |
|
#170
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sounds encouraging.
Last edited by Mr. X; July 15th, 2008 at 13:35. |
|
#171
|
||||
|
||||
Good to hear the varied MEP's are all in the loop...it's the same response as Neil Parish 5 days ago...
> Subject: RE: Letter from your constituent > Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:46:14 +0200 > From: neil.parish@europarl.europa.eu > To: > > Dear Mr , > > Thank you for your e-mail regarding the EU potential ban on > spearfishing. > > It seems you are not alone in fearing the possible implications of > Article 31 - many consituents have written to me regarding the same > issue. However, on contacting the Commission's department for Fisheries > and Maritime Affairs (DG MARE) regarding the proposed changed to the > Technical Conservation Regulations, the following reply was received: > > "The COM tried to prepare a new simplified and clarified proposal on > technical measures, in the structure and also in articles. On your point > (spear fishing), we must check on what is a projectile, but anyway we > can confirm you that it is not the intention of the Commission to > prohibit recreational spear fishing. If not clear the article concerned > will be corrected later during the discussions." > > Thus it seems you have nothing to fear from the proposals. I hope this > puts your mind at rest. > > Yours sincerely, > > Neil Parish MEP
__________________
__________________________________________________ _____________ "Kids that hunt, fish, and trap don't mug little old ladies" |
|
#172
|
||||
|
||||
It looks like the Conservatives are coordinating this centrally. Although I haven't heard back from my Conservative MEP since her initial response; nor my MP come to think of it. Surprised we didn't hear back from the Labour chap, thought he'd have a direct line to "the ministry". Did anyone hear from the UKIP chap in Newton Abbot/Torbay?
|
|
#173
|
|||
|
|||
It looks like the Neil-Parish original response doing the rounds, but this MEP (Mr Karim) has lodged his own personal enquiry and will send me the response when his PA Lucy gets it. Lucy also adds further words from MEP Struan Stevenson (see below) which say a bit more about what the EU was trying to ban via the proposal.
She also suggests the postal and fax details of DG-MARE is the way to enquire about the now intended timetable of events to get the proposal amended. An e-mail address for them would be nice. ************************************************** ****** Thank you again for getting in touch. That was indeed a speedy response! I have been in contact with Struan Stevenson MEP's assistant who has confirmed that the contact made between another colleague (Mr Neil Parish MEP) and the Commission, as I stated in the previous email, is correct. Mr Struan Stevenson is in fact the Conservative Spokesperson on Fisheries and has confirmed that the regulation does not target recreational spear fishing. The regulation is intended for guns involved that use explosives, such as those used for dolphins and whales; practices which are banned within the EU anyway. I can confirm that Mr Karim has also contacted the Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (DG MARE) in relation to the matter and we are currently awaiting a response. When we receive a response I will of course be in touch. Further to your request about finding further information as to dates, targets etc, I would advise that you contact the DG MARE; they can be contacted by post on: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Unit for Information and communication European Commission B-1049 Brussels Or by fax on: 32 2 299 30 40 I hope that this is of assistance. Kind regards Lucy Pickles Assistant to Sajjad Karim MEP Conservative Member of the European Parliament Representing the North West Tel: 0161 860 7572 Fax: 0161 860 7582 Email: info@sajjadkarim.eu Website: Sajjad Karim P SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary |
|
#174
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#175
|
|||
|
|||
More from Mr Karim's PA regarding tracking the proposal.
************************************************** **** The best person to contact would be Struan Stevenson MEPs office who would be most adept at keeping you up to speed given that he is the Spokesperson to the Conservatives in the European Parliament. I will endeavour to follow the 'ins and outs' of this too and let you know of any developments I hear. Many thanks Lucy |
|
#176
|
|||
|
|||
I've now got the Labour Fisheries' leader on the case too!
************************************************** ********************************************** Thank you for your e-mail about recreational spearfishing in the North Atlantic and for letting us have your postal address. Mr Titley MEP has asked his colleague Catherine Stihler who leads for the Labour side on fisheries, to let him have the latest position on this issue. He will be in touch with you again as soon as he has the information at hand. Yours sincerely Roger Fellows ..................................... Euro Office: 16 Spring Lane Radcliffe Manchester M26 2TQ Tel 0161 724 4008 Fax 0161 724 4009 |
|
#177
|
||||
|
||||
|
I worry that the EU is creating such broad laws with so little scrutiny or thought. The document certainly doesn't look like it has been scrutinized by lawyers. We were lucky that Rab brought this to our attention - otherwise we would never have heard of it, until it became law. The EU seem to wield far more power than they are able to safely handle IMHO.
Interesting to hear what the original intention was. I would think replacing the phrase "marine organisms" with "marine mammals" with specific regard to "projectiles" would achieve their original goal. Perhaps "projectile" should be replaced with something more specific too, e.g. "fire arms" with a clear definition of that phrase (e.g. "a weapon that uses an explosive charge", specifically excluding band-power spearguns and pneumatic spearguns). This phrase might be more challenging to get right. Spelling out that spear fishing and rod fishing are specifically excluded in the Exceptions-section would, of course, still be desirable. |
|
#178
|
|||
|
|||
Hi, Just got this message back direct from the European Commission. It does not say much more than the contact already received from MEPs. But does state again that the issues will be addressed.
Dear Sir, Thank you for your e-mail. Following your question regarding the consultation paper on proposed changes to EU Council Regulation 850/98 and in particular the banning of projectile fishing, please note that the European Commission tried to prepare a new simplified proposal on technical measures, in structure and also in articles. On your point (spearfishing), we must check/precise on what is a projectile (no definition) but we can, however, confirm that it is not the intention of the Commission to prohibit recreational spearfishing. If this is unclear, it will be corrected later before the adoption by the Council of that regulation. Yours sincerely, Information and Communication UnitDirectorate General Maritime Affairs and FisheriesEuropean Commission1049 BrusselsBelgium regards Kev |
|
#179
|
|||
|
|||
I have a reply from Struan Stevenson's PA. It details the timetable of stages for the proposal to be adopted as EU law, but doesn't initially answer all the things I requested answers for. Also I'm going to try and find out if these meetings are minuted for public view anywhere on their websites. I've been looking at some of the EU website meeting agendas in the last few mins and it looks like some sort of video streaming may be available. This needs further research. ************************************************** ************************************************ Thank you for your e-mail. The proposal, which the Commission only presented on 4th June 2008 is currently being dealt with in the Fisheries Committee in the European Parliament. (You can find the complete proposal attached for your information.) It is in a very early stage in the Parliament and the Rapporteur, who is Mr. Stevenson's Dutch colleague in the EPP-ED Group and on the Fisheries Committee - Mr. Cornelis Visser - has only been appointed on 2nd July 2008. The first exchange of views with the European Commission took place in the Fisheries Committee yesterday afternoon. This dossier is going through the consultation procedure, i.e. the Council of Ministers will have the final say on the Commission proposal. Although the European Parliament has a consultative role only, the Council cannot act before the Parliament delivers its opinion. The European Parliament Fisheries Committee is likely to adopt the proposal in December 2008 and in plenary on 14th January 2009, after which the proposal will be adopted in the next Agriculture and Fisheries Council in Janury/February 2008. It is only after this that the proposal will become legislation and be published in the Official Journal. I have contacted Mr. Visser's office this afternoon regarding any other important dates and will forward you their response should they have any additional information. Kind regards, Anna Dmitrijewa Parliamentary Assistant to STRUAN STEVENSON MEP Vice-President of the EPP-ED Group Conservative Member for Scotland European Parliament Rue Wiertz 60 Brussels B-1047 Tel: 0032 2 2847710 Fax: 0032 2 2849710 Sent: 15 December 2008 19:22 |