• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 44,280+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 516,210+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,441+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

75cm or 90cm comanche?

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 60 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

misterlizard

Tom Arnold
Oct 11, 2002
599
130
133
44
I've finally managed to save up enough money to get myself a Comanche. I have been using a Cazador 75cm for a few years now and I have decided to upgrade my equipment. The Comanche seems to be a really popular choice and it comes within my sub-£100 budget. But I don't know whether to get the 75cm gun or the 90cm. I generally hunt in the West Dorset area in kelpy reefy areas. I am starting to think that the 90cm might be a better choice as my 75cm gun is still perfectly useable.
 
Looks like you got the answer you need. Two different size guns = more options and hopefully more fish for the table. Simples!
 
Nice one, thanks for the reply. Ignore the private message I just sent you with the same question then!
 
Hell I had the same problem recently. I went for the Rob Allen Sparid 800 to have the best of both worlds.

Also agree with Kev on the 90cm
 
im only in my 2nd season but i would agree. i have a 60 75 and a 110 . i love the 110 so wen eva vis is good enough i use it.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…