-
Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Join over 44,280+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
- Participate in and browse from over 516,210+ posts.
- Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
- Post your own photos or view from 7,441+ user submitted images.
- All this and much more...
You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
Are some people spending too much time on DB?
- Thread starterisland_sands
- Start date
Thread Status: Hello
, There was no answer in this thread for more than 60 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.
Nope, no comments from me..... except that the rocket did what it was designed to do. The booster was an old SS-19 (Soviet-era ICBM) and desigend to drop a 200 kg atomic warhead somewhere in the US. Considering that the satellite was 650 kgs by itself and the 2nd/3rd stages were another ... say .... 350-400 kgs, having it fall into the Arctic Ocean does give "Proof of Concept..." 
Technical analysis into the failure is continuing.... BUT, it wasn't in an area that I had anything to do with <whew!>. I work on the validation and testing of the ground data networks.
Technical analysis into the failure is continuing.... BUT, it wasn't in an area that I had anything to do with <whew!>. I work on the validation and testing of the ground data networks.