cp1204 said:
So be it! Breathing out on accent.
I understood that FRC dives are *in general* shorter and less deep than usual ones. Then what are the advantages, besides lower risk of BO?
I guess it varies from person to person. For me, although the total dive time on my FRC dives is less than my inhale dives, the total bottom time is about the same.
For example, on a 40m recreational FRC dive my safe bottom time is about 20 seconds, vs. about 25 seconds on an inhale dive. However, after such a dive I recover in about 4 minutes for FRC; however I need at least 7 minutes to recover from an inhale dive to that depth, and for an inhale dive I'd really need to take a 10 minute interval for DCS safety, and even then I could only do about 5 dives before the risk of DCS is extreme.
So, given the similar bottom time and shorter recovery time on my FRC dives, my total bottom is much more than for inhale diving. The shorter recovery times are VERY important for cold winter diving when I can't spend long in the water; during cold water diving I want to spend as little time as possible 'waiting' in between dives to recover.
Also, I don't get narcosis on FRC dives, and the descent is far more enjoyable due to the fact that I sink the whole way down. Also I don't have to do the stressful packing procedure, which also eliminates the risk of a surface BO from packing.
Summary:
FRC
- No narcosis
- No DCS; dive as soon as you are ready to go down, no 'waiting' for nitrogen offloading
- Enjoyable descent sinking the whole way down
- Similar bottom time
- Way faster recovery time
- Greater total bottom time for a given amount of time in the water
- Faster onset of dive reflex (due to quick blood shift)
- No stressful packing or packing BO's
- Reduced negative effects in last 15m of ascent
- Makes me feel more like a seal