Well I most certainly welcome something like that. Unfortunately I don't have access to the text, and it is not clear from the quote what it means that it "may be explained by"... If it's an ad hoc hypothesis overall, or if they know part of it; that co2 build-up faster in alveoli, and if so if they know it has an effect on the arterial CO2 tension.
Now I'm not someone who knows a lot about this stuff. But that doesn't mean I can't see when conclussions are being rushed, or understand that there can be two (or more) contradicting assumptions.
There's an assumption in your previous post relating to the quote also that the lungs can act as storagetank for offloading blod co2. This is of course true in the sense that does so, but it is relevant to look at how much co2 is stored in the lungs. Another thing; the reason it dosen't makes sense is, that it is not explained why faster build-up of CO2 in the alveoli at the small lung volume, will lead to a more rapidly rising arterial CO2 tension. But of course I would guess it is because less co2 can offload into lungs wich would make sense IF the lungs could hold a lot of co2. But take a look at these quotes from two other DB member:
Blood CO2 is always lower on an exhale STATIC (not dive) because the ratio of gas:blood is lower. Since hemoglobin can both attach O2 and CO2 then the blood has both O2 storage and CO2 buffering, whereas the lungs have strongly unequal O2 storage and CO2 storage.
and
I did not have time until now to have a look at this thread, but see there are too many wrong assumptions and claims made there, so for the future visitors I think it may be worth of clearing up at least some of them.
CO2 is lower during exhale because:
1) You start with less O2, hence you produce less CO2 (CO2 is a metabolic product of oxygenation)
2) The DR is stronger, the metabolism lower, and muscles work in anaerobic mode earlier (hence not producing CO2)
3) As Eric wrote, the ratio of the two stores lungs and blood is much lower on exhale, and because the buffer capacity of lungs is very limited, it has a great impact. Very roughly on inhale the lungs contain around half of the O2 available, while the blood contains the rest. In the same time, the lungs even at a very progressed apnea contain just a few % of the overall CO2 that is in the body. 70-80% of CO2 is in the form of bicarbonate in the red blood cells, 5-10% is dissolved in the plasma, and 5-10% is bound to hemoglobin as carbamino compounds. So while the full lungs contain around half of the O2, they can only buffer a tiny fraction of the total CO2. It means that when you decrease the lung/blood ratio by exhaling, the buffering capacity does not change much, while the production is limited (due to lower available O2 and lower metabolism). Hence the CO2 level will be lower.
Strong DR is not depending on the CO2. According to studies, CO2 does not seem to be a major DR contributor.
These parts are particularly interesting
"the blood has both O2 storage and CO2 buffering, whereas the lungs have strongly unequal O2 storage and CO2 storage."/Efattah
"So while the full lungs contain around half of the O2, they can only buffer a tiny fraction of the total CO2. It means that when you decrease the lung/blood ratio by exhaling, the buffering capacity does not change much, while the production is limited (due to lower available O2 and lower metabolism). Hence the CO2 level will be lower."/Trux
So unless you think that it is the lungs level of co2 that is the point of interest - and I remember that you don't - it seems that co2 levels can not explain the faster urge to breathe.
Another thing: Do we really know where the body measure co2-levels in relation to DR? Perhaps we do, but perhaps the picture is complex. As Growingupninja also added, O2 levels can be a trigger too, something other people have experienced.
I have some more points, I'll write again later.
Btw I think it's great you experiment and have an orientation towards papers and research, but in relation to freediving there really seems to be more unknowns than knowns, and there no need to rush conclussions