I was wondering about this as beef and other non-swimming meats are hung for a period of time before they are even sold, to tenderise and improve the flavour of the meat. Fish however is sold as fresh as possible and rightly so as the majority of it caught through hook and net; where the fish struggles and uses up all the glycogen in it's muscles and therefore there is little to no glycogen left to turn into lactic acid, which acts as a preservative. When non-swimming meats are killed they are kept as relaxed as possible and the slaughtering procedure is as 'gentle' as possible to keep the glycogen levels as high as possible.
What I am asking is: Does stone killed fish (ie. complete rexlation of the muscles, like what happens with the effective use of the hawaiian sling) mean a better taste and longer shelf life than fish that sturggle?
Thanks,
Jason.
What I am asking is: Does stone killed fish (ie. complete rexlation of the muscles, like what happens with the effective use of the hawaiian sling) mean a better taste and longer shelf life than fish that sturggle?
Thanks,
Jason.