Just wanting to clarify something to clear up an argument that is happening merely in my own little head.
Was there a time when free-immersion tended to mean "pull down on the descent but ascend WITHOUT using the rope", and does it now mean "use rope for both ascent and descent"?
I thought for years that it was the former, but I have been advised otherwise. Was it ever like that and if so, when did it change (i.e. under AIDA competition ruling)?
I suppose that if it ever was as I thought, then FIM wouldn't be that much different from CWT once you hit the sink phase.
The question came up when I had an ongoing equalisation problem which meant that all I could do was feet-first free-immersion, a buddy asked why I was making life so difficult for myself by swimming back up with no fins instead of pulling on the rope, stupid
Was there a time when free-immersion tended to mean "pull down on the descent but ascend WITHOUT using the rope", and does it now mean "use rope for both ascent and descent"?
I thought for years that it was the former, but I have been advised otherwise. Was it ever like that and if so, when did it change (i.e. under AIDA competition ruling)?
I suppose that if it ever was as I thought, then FIM wouldn't be that much different from CWT once you hit the sink phase.
The question came up when I had an ongoing equalisation problem which meant that all I could do was feet-first free-immersion, a buddy asked why I was making life so difficult for myself by swimming back up with no fins instead of pulling on the rope, stupid