• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 47,943+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 531,990+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,455+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

Fishery Quotas = "Recipe for Disaster"?!

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 90 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

Seacidal

Seacidal Tendencies
Sep 27, 2005
116
8
0
GREENPEACE has today described the current fishing quota system as "a disaster for fish stocks, a disaster for fishermen and a disaster for conservation".

Responding to news that "massive" quantities of cod and other fish species in European waters are being discarded because of the system, Greenpeace Oceans campaigner Oliver Knowles said: “It’s time to abandon this madness and introduce a new approach to fisheries management – one based on controlling the number of days fisherman can spend at sea and introducing large marine reserves which provide fish stocks with the space to recover.”

Greenpeace proposes a new approach which:

1) Abandons the rigid quota system and replaces it with effort controls to reduce overall days at sea.

2) Makes further reductions in overall fleet capacity

3) Establishes large scale marine reserves closed to fishing, to provide areas where fish stocks can recover.


New forms of fisheries management are needed. Quotas are a blunt and ineffective tool in a mixed fishery like that of bottom trawling around the British Isles. Both the Government and the European Commission should work with the industry to agree on both permanent and seasonally closed areas around spawning grounds and other locations which should be backed up with satellite surveillance, robust policing and heavy fines.

Fishermen should then be entitled to land more of what they catch outside those areas on an agreed basis.

The problem with policing the quota system and responding to the understandable complaints about discarding perfectly healthy over quota fish is that it is not possible to distinguish between an intended and unintended by-catch of over quota stock.

“There are opportunities for fishermen, through their associations, to deal with areas where discarding is most apparent. We encourage them to act as stewards of the sea and take advantage of the gear technology that is available to them.”
 
This all sounds very good and Im quite excited about this, seems like a wide range of people is reponding to that issue.
One thing on less days at sea for the fisherman. Does less days not mean less distance from ports? If so inshore or close to shore fish stocks will still be obliterated, just quicker cause the fisherman heads for the closest reef thats still producing catches and so finishes stocks that comes close to shore before heading back to deeper waters.
Im still saying resticting catch methods is a better option like limiting it to line catching only for a certain period of years. In this way there is much less bycatch :)
 
DeeperBlue.com - The Worlds Largest Community Dedicated To Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing

ABOUT US

ISSN 1469-865X | Copyright © 1996 - 2026 DeeperBlue Global Media Limited.

DeeperBlue.com is an independent digital media platform dedicated to Scuba Diving, Freediving, Ocean Advocacy, and Dive Travel.

Since 1996, we’ve been informing, educating, and inspiring the global diving community through trusted news, features, and shared community experience.

ADVERT