Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
The question made me think a monofin for arms with feets extended in hydrodynamic position, arms above head, equalization/moutfill etc would be much easier but would require hard trainning to bring the body work the opposite. Imagine the classic monofin style in the opposite. Air would be available all the time on the head for equalization.
Just a thought, and who knows it might be the future of freediving CWT style..![]()
2. The other reason is just due to physics - air will move from high pressure to low pressure in water (pressure is force/area so there is more force acting from under than from above so it moves up - if I am correct!) so when you are head down it's harder to move air from your lungs to the head and specifically the e-tubes. When you are descending feet down the pressure difference between your head and lungs is helping you move air up to your ear drum but the opposite is true when you are head down...
you are not correct! (if i may go beck to the original post subject)
air dose move from high to low pressure but it dose so in order to reach the point of equilibrium. in a confine space (air ways) the air is always at the same pressure. it is true that the lower (deeper in the water) part will be smaller in volume - like squeezing a part of a balloon so that the other part bulges out - but that shouldn't interfere with equalization.
so air dose not go up, it dosnt go anywhere, the body that holds it just change shape due to the water pressure.
more over, (if you think of the balloon example) there are 50(+-)cm from the lowest part of the lungs to the e-tubs. that is 1/20 of an atmosphere(pressure). dont you think thats negligible?
let me ask this with a different example:
lets take a 10m diameter rubble ball and submerge it in water. what shap will it take?
at its highest part it is 1 atmosphere and at the lowest 2 atmosphere.
lets say that his shape is now of an upside down pear. so air did move up, naturally, but it doesn't anymore and the air pressure is the same all over our ball. even if we take it down to -100m the ratio of pressure will stay the same and thus its shape also stay the same. he will be more compressed, naturally, but with the same shape air did not move anywhere.
am i missing something?
Apologies to you Sodeds. I think it is closely related. @ Simos..bingo with number 2. I thought that body position had very little affect. That simple experiment proved me wrong.