I just bought the Nemo last week and wanted to share my impressions with you. When deciding which computer to buy, I had troubles finding information, so maybe this will help someone in the future. We did a freediving session with a friend who has a Suunto Mosquito so I can compare these two a little bit. After Mares dropped their prices, the price tag is almost the same on these two.
The main difference we noticed was that the Nemo is much faster than the Mosquito. The Mosquito seem to lag behind by around 1s, giving max depth readouts around 0,5 m less than the Nemo. We did try this while having both computers on the same hand next to each other.
The display of the Nemo is slightly bigger, with bigger numbers. To me it also seemed to be more logical in some situations. For example during surface interval the Nemo displays the max depth and surf. time in big numbers, dive time in and dive nr. in small ones. The Mosquito displays the ACTUAL depth (surprise surprise... its 0.0m :head) and the surf. time in big numbers, max depth and dive time in small ones.
When it comes to the profile of your freedives, here the Nemo has weaknesses compared to the Mosquito. It only records profiles for the last session. Whenever you change alarm settings, a new session is started and previous profiles are lost. And you can only view freedive profiles by downloading data to the PC. But it displays and stores basic data (max depth, dive time, surf. time, temp.) for all the dives in all sessions.
Summary:
Pros of the Nemo compared to the Mosquito:
Faster refresh rate
Bigger and more readable display
Titanium/SS case with saphire coated mineral glass vs. plastic
Cons
Freedive profiles - only stores last sessions profiles, accessible through PC download only, 4s sampling rate
So if you want to thoroughly analyze your freedive profiles then go for the Mosquito, otherwise the Nemo is a better choice. I did not cover any of the scuba functions as here theses two are basicly the same. For me I found the perfect computer (don't really care about freedive profiles), and would definitely buy Nemo again.
The main difference we noticed was that the Nemo is much faster than the Mosquito. The Mosquito seem to lag behind by around 1s, giving max depth readouts around 0,5 m less than the Nemo. We did try this while having both computers on the same hand next to each other.
The display of the Nemo is slightly bigger, with bigger numbers. To me it also seemed to be more logical in some situations. For example during surface interval the Nemo displays the max depth and surf. time in big numbers, dive time in and dive nr. in small ones. The Mosquito displays the ACTUAL depth (surprise surprise... its 0.0m :head) and the surf. time in big numbers, max depth and dive time in small ones.
When it comes to the profile of your freedives, here the Nemo has weaknesses compared to the Mosquito. It only records profiles for the last session. Whenever you change alarm settings, a new session is started and previous profiles are lost. And you can only view freedive profiles by downloading data to the PC. But it displays and stores basic data (max depth, dive time, surf. time, temp.) for all the dives in all sessions.
Summary:
Pros of the Nemo compared to the Mosquito:
Faster refresh rate
Bigger and more readable display
Titanium/SS case with saphire coated mineral glass vs. plastic
Cons
Freedive profiles - only stores last sessions profiles, accessible through PC download only, 4s sampling rate
So if you want to thoroughly analyze your freedive profiles then go for the Mosquito, otherwise the Nemo is a better choice. I did not cover any of the scuba functions as here theses two are basicly the same. For me I found the perfect computer (don't really care about freedive profiles), and would definitely buy Nemo again.