Hi,
I was thinking about buying a new mask for deepdiving. Inspired from other threads I think a highly compressible mask is better than a low volume mask.
Example: If I can take the mask to 30m without equalisation it compresses to ¼ . (1 bar to 4 bar)
This means if I want to dive to 70m (8 bar) you have to equalise the mask at 10m and than no more! (2 bar to 8 bar).
Do you see any mistake there?
If this is right you can save all the air (mouthfill) for equalisation of the ears. This would even be better than a pipemask.
Now I would like to now, which mask is the most compressable one.
Please tell me, which mask you have and how deep you can take it without equalising it.
Has anybody ever tried to make it more flexible. I think „breaking“ the rim above the nose so the lenses could move independantly could help a lot.
Thanks
Marc
I was thinking about buying a new mask for deepdiving. Inspired from other threads I think a highly compressible mask is better than a low volume mask.
Example: If I can take the mask to 30m without equalisation it compresses to ¼ . (1 bar to 4 bar)
This means if I want to dive to 70m (8 bar) you have to equalise the mask at 10m and than no more! (2 bar to 8 bar).
Do you see any mistake there?
If this is right you can save all the air (mouthfill) for equalisation of the ears. This would even be better than a pipemask.
Now I would like to now, which mask is the most compressable one.
Please tell me, which mask you have and how deep you can take it without equalising it.
Has anybody ever tried to make it more flexible. I think „breaking“ the rim above the nose so the lenses could move independantly could help a lot.
Thanks
Marc