• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 44,280+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 516,210+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,441+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

More power please!

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 60 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

Badger

Well-Known Member
Nov 26, 2009
15
4
93
63
Just converted my 1.4 rail gun to a gun that is hopefully capable of landing a bigger fish like Tuna or Doggie. I replaced the 7 mm spear with an 8 mm shaft, a Daryll Wong slip tip, locally made by the way, and a breakaway rig. Pool testing shows that the spear is remarkably accurate but does drop slightly when shooting from distances greater than 4 metres. Currently using a 20 mm rubber 870 mm length(total) Was thinking of going 2 x 20 mm but that may be too strong and cause the spear to damage the trigger release mech. which would not end well. Would 2 x 16 mm rubbers provide more power? 2 X 18 mm? Can only go to max. of two bands. Planning on using a 2 metre bungy onto a surf lifesaving foam filled float followed by a 5 metre bungy and a 35 litre air filled float, hope that this will provide enough resistance.
 
Yes. The stored energy with 2 X 16 mm will be more than with 1 X 20 mm. Theoretically; you can compare the square section of the bands. A = phi X sq r
1 X A20 = (phi X sq10) - (phi X sq2) = 302 mm2
2 X A16 = 2 X ((phi X sq8) - (phi X sq2)) = 377 mm2
Provided that the length, hole inside and the material of the slings are the same 2 X 16 mm would theoretically be 377/302 = 1,25 = 25% more powerful.
Jégwan
 
Last edited:
Yes. The stored energy with 2 X 16 mm will be more than with 1 X 20 mm. Theoretically; you can compare the square section of the bands. A = phi X sq r
1 X A20 = (phi X sq10) - (phi X sq2) = 302 mm2
2 X A16 = 2 X ((phi X sq8) - (phi X sq2)) = 377 mm2
Provided that the length, hole inside and the material of the slings are the same 2 X 16 mm would theoretically be 377/302 = 1,25 = 25% more powerful.
Jégwan
Thanks Jegwan, appreciate the time you have taken.
 
You're welcome.
Please note, that if you change to a smaller diameter band, you will be able to pull one that is shorter than the 20 mm you use now. A 18 mm band will perform it's best at a stretch around 270 - 340% a 16 mm band around 290-370%. What you can pull is normally the upper limit. I can't stretch a 16 mm band to anything near 370%!
Jégwan
 
Just converted my 1.4 rail gun to a gun that is hopefully capable of landing a bigger fish like Tuna or Doggie. I replaced the 7 mm spear with an 8 mm shaft, a Daryll Wong slip tip, locally made by the way, and a breakaway rig. Pool testing shows that the spear is remarkably accurate but does drop slightly when shooting from distances greater than 4 metres. Currently using a 20 mm rubber 870 mm length(total) Was thinking of going 2 x 20 mm but that may be too strong and cause the spear to damage the trigger release mech. which would not end well. Would 2 x 16 mm rubbers provide more power? 2 X 18 mm? Can only go to max. of two bands. Planning on using a 2 metre bungy onto a surf lifesaving foam filled float followed by a 5 metre bungy and a 35 litre air filled float, hope that this will provide enough resistance.


If youre going to target doggie's over 50kg a 3/8 6ft ( 10mm 1.8m) shaft will give you the most consistent results. Sure fish have been landed with lighter gear, but many lost too. I wouldn't consider anything less than the above if I was targeting fish in the weight class from 30kg to 100kg. I like using three bungy's straight off the back of the gun (no breakaway rig). The riffe bungys revolutionised the landing of doggies in the mid 90's, & we saw our record rise from 55kg
 
Sorry about above post ,it cut short & I don't see how to edit.
Yes, bungy's are great & the more the better . I use three with a small egg shaped float between each as this lets you pull up & clip off your rig at these points without the fear of the fish running & breaking the bungy if you clipped off in the middle of a section. I like to apply a 3:1 ratio of fish to float ( don't remember why but it hasn't failed yet), so a float with 35 litre displacement should land a 105 kg pelagic.

I use 3 5/8 rubbers to launch the above shaft & use a 4:1 ratio on these. I've got bigger guns with more power but its always a compromise & I've had the best luck with this above combination.

Cheers Sharkey
 
DeeperBlue.com - The Worlds Largest Community Dedicated To Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing

ABOUT US

ISSN 1469-865X | Copyright © 1996 - 2024 deeperblue.net limited.

DeeperBlue.com is the World's Largest Community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving, Ocean Advocacy and Diving Travel.

We've been dedicated to bringing you the freshest news, features and discussions from around the underwater world since 1996.

ADVERT