Hello everyone! I've been lurking here for a couple months and thought I would finally register. I have a question about spearguns that I think you guys can help me answer.
First, I'll introduce myself and give you some background.
I have been "snorkling" since I was in the 8th grade and making trips to LaJolla cove and just you standard sandy beaches. Then, when I found out I was going to get into UC Santa Barbara I thought that it would be a great chance to get into freediving since there are beautifull kelp forests and sometimes very clear waters here. On my first dive I actually saw a school of white seabass! I started out with a JBL travel pole-spear. Then I wanted to go after calicos so I bought an Omer. I later that year lost it when the clip that attached to my float line failed in a surf zone So that summer while at home I replaced it with a sawed-off magnum because it was cheap, big mistake. I caught a few fish with it but it has NO power. I can't even aim horizontally in the water because gravity pulls the shaft down too quickly.
So now in the fall quarter of my sophomore year here the visibility sucks. I don't know what happened by the clear waters of last fall are nowhere to be seen. I'm getting frustrated with the weather here so I decided to get on a boat for Santa Cruz island where the waters are almost always 40-60 feet vis. So this trip cost me $80. There is no way I'm wasting that money by using my crappy gun.
So I decided I want a metal tech. I want to get something good because I don't want to replace another gun (This time I'm double zip-tieing it to the float line). I also love the midhandle design after my magnum. I hate the magnum but it is nice to hold. They are a little more expensive but I'm willing to pay more if it's a quality gun. I'm just not sure if I want a MT3 or MT4. The MT4 supposedly gives you 4' more range than the MT3. But I was thinking, if the MT3 goes to 20', why would I even need that extra range. But are the figures on the riffe handout accurate? I want to be able to get white seabass, calicos, and sheepshead in the kelp forest. This means I need a fair amount of range and manueverability. But I would also like to go to Cortez Banks and get some yellowtail from time to time. The guys and the Bluewater Hunter store here in Santa Barbara said that by getting an MT4, I could definately go after fish like these and even be happy with it in places like the gulf of mexico. Could I expect this sort of performance of the MT3? I've seen that one of the members here has speared some BIG fish with an MT0. I'm not afraid of developing skill to get close to fish, actually I think I'm decent at it already but I also don't want to get to a point where the gun is going to be limiting me, and spoiling an expensive boat trip.
So, is an MT3 going to meet my needs? And if not, would an MT4 be much more ungainly going thru the kelp.
BTW, I still have my polespear and the dreaded magnum for when the vis sucks so I don't need a really short gun. Although, the stories of the MT0 are tempting I wish I could afford both.
-Chad
First, I'll introduce myself and give you some background.
I have been "snorkling" since I was in the 8th grade and making trips to LaJolla cove and just you standard sandy beaches. Then, when I found out I was going to get into UC Santa Barbara I thought that it would be a great chance to get into freediving since there are beautifull kelp forests and sometimes very clear waters here. On my first dive I actually saw a school of white seabass! I started out with a JBL travel pole-spear. Then I wanted to go after calicos so I bought an Omer. I later that year lost it when the clip that attached to my float line failed in a surf zone So that summer while at home I replaced it with a sawed-off magnum because it was cheap, big mistake. I caught a few fish with it but it has NO power. I can't even aim horizontally in the water because gravity pulls the shaft down too quickly.
So now in the fall quarter of my sophomore year here the visibility sucks. I don't know what happened by the clear waters of last fall are nowhere to be seen. I'm getting frustrated with the weather here so I decided to get on a boat for Santa Cruz island where the waters are almost always 40-60 feet vis. So this trip cost me $80. There is no way I'm wasting that money by using my crappy gun.
So I decided I want a metal tech. I want to get something good because I don't want to replace another gun (This time I'm double zip-tieing it to the float line). I also love the midhandle design after my magnum. I hate the magnum but it is nice to hold. They are a little more expensive but I'm willing to pay more if it's a quality gun. I'm just not sure if I want a MT3 or MT4. The MT4 supposedly gives you 4' more range than the MT3. But I was thinking, if the MT3 goes to 20', why would I even need that extra range. But are the figures on the riffe handout accurate? I want to be able to get white seabass, calicos, and sheepshead in the kelp forest. This means I need a fair amount of range and manueverability. But I would also like to go to Cortez Banks and get some yellowtail from time to time. The guys and the Bluewater Hunter store here in Santa Barbara said that by getting an MT4, I could definately go after fish like these and even be happy with it in places like the gulf of mexico. Could I expect this sort of performance of the MT3? I've seen that one of the members here has speared some BIG fish with an MT0. I'm not afraid of developing skill to get close to fish, actually I think I'm decent at it already but I also don't want to get to a point where the gun is going to be limiting me, and spoiling an expensive boat trip.
So, is an MT3 going to meet my needs? And if not, would an MT4 be much more ungainly going thru the kelp.
BTW, I still have my polespear and the dreaded magnum for when the vis sucks so I don't need a really short gun. Although, the stories of the MT0 are tempting I wish I could afford both.
-Chad