• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 44,280+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 516,210+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,441+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

Olympus really that much better?

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 60 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

fuzz

Hawaiian transplant...
Sep 9, 2002
995
73
0
44
Posted this over in Wetpixel.com as well...

Just wondering since I see so many advocates for Oly's - is there any qualitative difference between Olys, canon's, & sony's?

I'm looking to pick up a c-4000 & PT-010 housing probably tomorrow & would appreciate any advice/insight!

Thank you.
 

andrsn

Just visiting...
Aug 26, 2001
1,213
75
138
48
ever thought about the c5050? i'd like to upgrade to it because it accepts much beefier storage pieces and has a faster lens. the oly housing is just as cheap.

A
 

fuzz

Hawaiian transplant...
Sep 9, 2002
995
73
0
44
It's a $300 jump, otherwise I'd love to... :(
I'm getting it as a present & I have to follow my budget guidelines ;)

Right now I"m more perplexed over the brand differences. :confused:
 

Jon

Dairyland diver
Supporter
Apr 7, 2001
4,080
473
188
55
Someone on the digital diver site posted a place where you can get the new pt015 housing, for the 5050z camera, for only $150!

That's half of what I paid a few months ago. I have owned a lot of film cameras over the years and my little digital is by far my favorite.

Jon
 

andrsn

Just visiting...
Aug 26, 2001
1,213
75
138
48
Fuzz, the Oly's have a faster lens than most other digitals which make them ideal for underwater stuff. You can't go wrong w/ the c4000 and the Oly housing. A gift just seems even sweeter.

All my pics on my website were with the c3000 and either a Oly PT housing or an ikelite housing. Can't tell the difference b/w housings, but the Oly housing was about half the cost.

Good luck,
Anderson
 

DiverD

New Member
Jan 3, 2003
98
16
0
57
Fast lens

Fuzz, the Oly's have a faster lens than most other digitals which make them ideal for underwater stuff. You can't go wrong w/ the c4000 and the Oly housing. A gift just seems even sweeter.

Actually, andrsn, the Olympus cameras ending in 40 (and now 50, with the 5050) are the ones with the fastest lenses, the 4000 has a slower one, maybe 2.8 compared with the 1.8 on the '40s and 5050.
 

andrsn

Just visiting...
Aug 26, 2001
1,213
75
138
48
Ah, good to know! :D I have the C3000. Maybe my neon subjects would come out in better focus w/ a faster lensed Oly? :confused:

A
 

DiverD

New Member
Jan 3, 2003
98
16
0
57
fast lens

The fast lens means the aperature opens wider. wider aperatures mean shallower depths of field, which means the focus plane is thinner, less things are in focus except on the plane that is in focus. But this means more light can come in, this is good in low lighting, like when underwater. when I zoom the lens of my 2040 the lens will no longer open to it's full 1.8 aperture, it stops at 2.2 or 2.8 or so (not sure). I notice with the strobe, a smaller aperature opening (life f8 or f11) gives a darker background which I don't really like. I haven't worked out shooting with a strobe...yet!
 

andrsn

Just visiting...
Aug 26, 2001
1,213
75
138
48
DD, not sure how the digitals work, but I know that my nikons have a better time focusing w/ my faster lenses, even when I have them stopped down for the actual exposure. I'm assuming because they don't shut down the aperture until the shutter is released, right? Again, not sure this is the case w/ digital, but I'd imagine it'd help.

I like the dark background (f8+) when using a strobe. Wide open seems to wash out too many things in your frame. Plus, it makes you look deeper than you are. ;)

A
 

DiverD

New Member
Jan 3, 2003
98
16
0
57
DiverD

andrsn,

I really, really, don't know when it comes to digital, someone told me that a digital doesn't have a shutter at all, and everything is emulated, that's why in the RAW format you can change things like shutter speed. And I've never had an auto focus 35mm, just the old-fashined do it all yourself kind so I guess I'm really in the dark (pun intended).

But your'e right -- those dark backgrounds look deep, some shots I took this weekend looked like I shot them at 1000' underwater. They were almost frightening!
 
DeeperBlue.com - The Worlds Largest Community Dedicated To Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing

ABOUT US

ISSN 1469-865X | Copyright © 1996 - 2021 deeperblue.net limited.

DeeperBlue.com is the World's Largest Community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving, Spearfishing and Diving Travel.

We've been dedicated to bringing you the freshest news, features and discussions from around the underwater world since 1996.

ADVERT