• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 44,280+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 516,210+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,441+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

One band or two ?

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 60 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

Johann

New Member
Dec 15, 2006
48
3
0
44
Hey all,

I was wondering what the "pro's and con's" are between one band or two bands are on an open water gun like a 140cm ?
the options on the gun are 2x16mm bands, or 1x20mm. And then theres reels ?????
If there is someone who could help ?

regards
Johann
 
On my 140 'Carbon Strongback' i use 3 x 16mm bands. i couldnt imagine being able to load a single band with the same power [maybe i'm a wimp! ]. On my riffe 110 i also use 3 bands but sometimes just load 2. even my 75cm gun has 2 bands.
i think its mainly just ease of loading - time difference loading is negligible.
i have read suggestions that power transition when fired is different, but i'm not sure?
i will be interested to see what others think...
 
Hi Johann,

Single 20 mm:
A single band is quicker to reload. The difference between loading one or two bands could mean the difference between shooting another fish out of a shoal or not, especially when hunting fish like Yellowtail where you may be on a shoal for a very short time.

One band compared to two means less stuff to get tangled up.

I don't know if it's just the way how I use my guns but I find my 20mm bands seem to last longer than the 16's. Also, replacing a single 20 is cheaper than two 16's.

Double 16 mm:
A 16 mm band is much easier to load than a 20mm which is why most guys prefer them on their longer guns. Except for my tuna gun which has 4x16's on all my guns over 120 have double 16's.

Because its easier to reload a 16mm band will be shorter on than a 20mm band on the same gun. Besides the fact that with two bands you have more rubber working for you, a shorter band will drive the spear for a longer time than the 20mm which means a faster spear and longer shots.

As for reels. For me it's up to where and what fish I'm hunting and I will set-up my kit i.e. reel or no reel accordingly.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Jonny and Landshark, I think I have made my choice ;-)
And finding out the single band costs more kinda helped with the choice as well ! As for replacement costs, I make up my own bands, and have stock of 16mm band for my current 100cm.

Reel. . . . . I still don't know ? Gues I'l keep hunting the way I do 'til I need a reel.

Thank you both for the valuable info again.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…