The more freedivers I speak to the more I realise that the concept of PB is perhaps one of the main contributing factors for lots of BOs.
What is wrong with PBs?
1. It's a flawed concept - no two days or performances are the same so essentially it means nothing apart from the fact that on that particular dive you did X metres or mins
2. Unlike other sports like 100m sprint, using your PB as a target or measure of your potential has dangerous consequences. In 100m sprint, athletes try to break their PB all the time, but most of the time they simply fail and all that happens is that they run a slower time. In Freediving, aiming to beat your one-off PB leads to BO if not successful.
3. This is more controversial but perceiving the best dive as the longest or deepest engrains the 'wrong' attitude towards diving
I don't know what the answer is but some ideas would be to make the 'PB' somehow an average over a number of recent dives, or something along those lines.
Anyone else thinks PBs are a troublesome concept?
What is wrong with PBs?
1. It's a flawed concept - no two days or performances are the same so essentially it means nothing apart from the fact that on that particular dive you did X metres or mins
2. Unlike other sports like 100m sprint, using your PB as a target or measure of your potential has dangerous consequences. In 100m sprint, athletes try to break their PB all the time, but most of the time they simply fail and all that happens is that they run a slower time. In Freediving, aiming to beat your one-off PB leads to BO if not successful.
3. This is more controversial but perceiving the best dive as the longest or deepest engrains the 'wrong' attitude towards diving
I don't know what the answer is but some ideas would be to make the 'PB' somehow an average over a number of recent dives, or something along those lines.
Anyone else thinks PBs are a troublesome concept?