• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 44,280+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 516,210+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,441+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

Reject Michael Sutton as Fish & Game Commissioner

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 60 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

gimme

New Member
Aug 4, 2009
5
0
0
Call (916) 651-4151 and tell them that you do not support Mike Sutton as the Fish and Game Commisioner.

Heres why:

[ame=http://www.spearboard.com/showthread.php?t=91342]Urgent - Make this call now!!!!! - Spearboard Spearfishing Community[/ame]

Monday, August 31, 2009

Senator Darrell Steinberg, Chair
Senate Rules Committee
State Capitol, Room 400
Sacramento CA 95814
Phone: (916) 651-4151
Fax: (916) 455-0596

RE: CONFIRMATION HEARING FOR MICHAEL SUTTON AS FISH AND GAME COMMISSIOER – OPPOSE.

Dear Senator Steinberg,

The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) is a national 501(c)(4) non-profit grassroots political action organization whose mission is to safeguard the rights of salt water anglers, protect marine, boat, and tackle industry jobs, and insure the long-term sustainability of our nation’s marine fisheries.

On behalf of the RFA, I urge you to reject the confirmation of Michael Sutton as Fish & Game Commissioner.

Mr. Sutton has made himself unavailable to anglers and divers, yet he meets regularly with representatives of environmental organizations; he has even stated that he sees these well-funded, out-of-state organizations as his "constituency" rather than the people of California.

Mr. Sutton has shown complete disregard to the recreational fishing community, and seems unaware that we provide more than $60 million in funding for the Department of Fish and Game through our license fees alone.

As a long-time employee of the Packard Foundation, he has a serious conflict of interest in the Marine Life Protection Act process. The Packard Foundation has provided much of the funding for the MLPA stakeholder process, which is one thing, but to have one of its employees casting a vote on the outcome has caused a complete loss of trust among the fishing communities of California.

It's ironic that the MLPA regulations for the north-central coast will actually damage sustainable fisheries such as abalone diving, and hand-harvest of nutritional seaweed, rather than providing needed conservation benefits. Mr. Sutton simply would not meet with or listen to representatives of the abalone divers to learn more about the data and how the regulations would threaten sustainable fisheries.

Prior to his appointment to the Fish & Game Commission, Mr. Sutton testified as an advocate for specific MPA proposals that call into question his objectivity on the issues.

As a current board member of the political action committee, "Ocean Champions," Mr. Sutton is actively engaged in electioneering and corrupts the stature of the Commission as an independent decision-making body.

Environmental justice is a very important issue to us. When members of the Pomo band at Stewarts Point begged Mr. Sutton to make small adjustments to the MLPA regulations in the north-central region, he refused and broke a cultural link to nature that lasted for hundreds of years for that community. He has voted for regulations that disproportionately affect the low-income sectors of society that can least afford it.

Above all, Mr. Sutton has an agenda for privatizing public trust resources through Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs) and corporate ownership of commercial fishing operations. He supports private funding for traditional fishery management that will inevitably remove the public even further from decisions affecting people's quality of life, our marine resources and the economic-wellbeing of coastal communities.

The people of California deserve Commissioners who are open-minded and listen to all sides before making a decision. Mr. Sutton has given every impression that he is a lobbyist for a single advocacy group, and not even representative of the entire "environmental community." Recreational anglers in particular feel their public testimony is a waste of time at Fish and Game Commission hearings. This sentiment undermines our ability to engage the public in important regulatory decisions because people know "the game is rigged."

We urge you to reject the confirmation of Michael Sutton as Fish and Game Commissioner.

Sincerely,


Jim Martin
West Coast Regional Director
The Recreational Fishing Alliance
__________________
 
Imagine if the sportsmen of California flexed their muscle for just one year by abstaining from purchasing fishing and hunting licenses. As fantastic as that would be, it would certainly show the DFG and the Commission who they really work for :hmm
 
Voting with your wallet, it's the bottom line!
 
Indeed, Adrian. I've already done so. The Commission in its infinite wisdom decided to increase the cost of licenses by a certain percentage per year, indefinitely. No fishing license for me this year!
 
How much does a fishing license cost there? Here it's 13 euros for spearfishing/year.
 
The cost of a fishing license in California is about $33, last I checked. However, the Commission in its infinite wisdom has decided that licenses should increase by a certain percentage per year (3%, I think), and will continue to do so for an indefinite period of time. There is no limitation for the increase, so licenses become less practical for more casual sportsmen.
 
Good luck with that. Sounds like a very odd politician that won't meet with let alone represent their constituents. My brother's MP is similar though. He asked her to raise a very minor issue on animal welfare and she told him she hold opposite views! Serves him right for not voting in the last election. That's why it is important that hunters and fishers get out and vote.
 
Sounds like a very odd politician that won't meet with let alone represent their constituents.

I completely agree. That has been happening more and more. Many politicians are willing to meet with their constituents as long as the constituents agree with their policies and wishes. Recent town hall meetings haven't been going as the politicians would like, and I've heard that some of those have been suspended. Instead of listening to their voters, they've decided to shut down communication. So much for a representative government.
 
DeeperBlue.com - The Worlds Largest Community Dedicated To Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing

ABOUT US

ISSN 1469-865X | Copyright © 1996 - 2024 deeperblue.net limited.

DeeperBlue.com is the World's Largest Community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving, Ocean Advocacy and Diving Travel.

We've been dedicated to bringing you the freshest news, features and discussions from around the underwater world since 1996.

ADVERT