• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 44,280+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 516,210+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,441+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

Speargun Build Simulator

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 60 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.
Hi John, thanks for your interest.
Different people have different opinion based on their experience... it's just not scientific to judge things based on feel or perception. There are only two ways to determine if adding another band adds a commensurate amount of shaft energy: measuring shaft muzzle velocity (which is difficult) or a penetration test through a uniform medium. Don't forget: energy is proportional to velocity squared, so adding 25% more energy (a 5th band) could not add more than 12% velocity - but it'll still penetrate 25% more into a fish. It's really hard to perceive a less-than-12% velocity increase.
Good point - since inverted rollers retract at half the speed of their counterparts then they *should* be less affected by rate of contraction limitations. However, packaging an inverted roller as a system is difficult. You need twice as many bands for the same energy - that why a lot of them are less powerful. There's always a compromise with physics.
Mate - this is similar to what I did, except I left them stretched at 350% for 30 mins to account for dissipation over time. Assuming a linear spring is pretty close up until 310-320% and good enough for Rob Allen and Jeremy from Dive Factory. I finished the thesis last year and Annex A has the raw rubber data. Assuming your data is in pounds then it's pretty close to what I got when I was stretching the bands, although my recorded data is measuring relaxation after 30 mins.

Sorry mate, don't have the time atm to unwind that spreadsheet - maybe someone else here would be able to help. I'm adding a rubber section to the website when I get time, it might be able to help with things like this in future.

Good luck!
 
Appreciate the response. I think I'll be able to play around with the tool you created to compare my bands in a general sense.

Agree with what you are saying about the need to measure power based on science instead of experiential perception. My point is only that it is pretty easy with a traditional band gun to set up a target with heavy resistance and figure out what the "max" power is by adding bands until you get to the point where adding another band does not increase penetration. Obviously methodology and other factors (i.e. spear whip/bend) may come into play, but being able to experiment with different numbers of bands relatively quickly and easily definitely offers an advantage when you are trying to understand these things.

That same type of testing is much more difficult with a roller gun. With the two-roller gun I built, I can't just throw on a third roller to run a penetration test in a pool, I have to build a separate three-roller gun.

Maybe one of these days I'll strike it rich and buy the equipment to calculate actual velocities. Would be a ton of fun and take a lot of the guesswork out and get real-world numbers answering my questions.
 
Do you think bands loose power at depth?

Also i cant tell the color of the two different graphs, which is which etc. If you could make it different color instead of two similar blues it would be great. Like it a lot in general.

I think the important thing you can improve as you said is shaft dynamics and drag coefficient. For example it overestimates the speed of an overpowered shaft. I put 3 18mm rubbers 3.5 stretch and it thinks the poor 8mm 140cm shaft will go 40 m/s when in practice it will not hit target for sure and it will not achieve faster speed than 2 16mm bands at 2 meters.
 
Last edited:
@Jesse_Spiller

First of all I am gratefull for your research. Amazing work being done. Finally something that we can work on that is not perception based.

I have one question, while working on setup for my new guns and working around inverted idea.
I hope I am wrong but I think the inverted calculations are wrong. Somewhere in the calcs instead DIVIDE by 2 there is MULTIPLY by 2 for inverted.

I have read the paper and science behind it which I love but I BELIEVE the simulator is doing the inverted rollers math wrong but I hope its me still not understanding it properly.

If you compare gun
X = Double 2x14mm 350%
Y = Inverted 1x14mm 350%

X=Y with very small difference. There is no WAY I can believe that considering that with inverted everything is halfed.

Same story if you double the bands in X and Y by 2. All results end up pretty much equal with minor differences.
It is possible that the inverted calculations are multiplied by 2 instead diveded by 2?

EDIT: DID FURTHER TESTING
Inverted 1 window - X=Y
Inverted 2 window - X = 1/2Y

EDIT2. I managed to contact the author and everything works fine, it was me missing that there is the "doubled" window - YES in inverted 1 window that would double the amount of bands basicly.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…