• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 44,280+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 516,210+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,441+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

The Ability-Adaptation Squeeze Model

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 60 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

wjohnson100

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2007
119
12
108
67
"First, let me say that I am not trying to postulate a universal theory of everything. I am merely trying to get us to a model which is valid to the extent that it is useful and suggests productive avenues of improvement in our thought processes, training, and tactics. I will be making some generalizations, as that is the nature of models, but rest assured, I am aware that no model can possibly account for all the variables that present themselves on even one dive. Still, I feel that this model will be useful, because I think it brings a bit of a useful focus to the recent events that have traumatized all of us."

The rest of the article is at The Ability-Adaptation Squeeze Model, or if your browser will not support embedded .pdf viewing, you can go to The Ability-Adaptation Squeeze Model. Hi-def 1920x1080 illustrations related to the article are available at Illustrations.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sanso

Nicholas_Mevoli_-_Dive_Profile.png

Nicholas_Mevoli_-_Worst_Case.png

Lung_Volume_Increase.png

Empty_Lung_Dive.png

Bad_Turn.png

Reverse_Packing.png

Generic_Profile.png

Nicholas_Mevoli_-_Worst_Case.png

Nicholas_Mevoli_-_Dive_Profile.png

Lung_Volume_Increase.png

Empty_Lung_Dive.png
Bad_Turn.png

Reverse_Packing.png

Generic_Profile.png

Half Lung Dive.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ruby and sanso
Graphs on FRC and 1/2 lung are good illustrators of the squeeze dangers of that approach. I agree completely with the principals illustrated.

Just a quibble. I don't think that being able to equalize 1/2 lung to 30 meters is quite equivalent to equalizing at 70 meters full lung, don't care what the math shows, there is something else involved.

The rest of the article is a very good and thoughtful read.


Connor
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I am glad you found it all interesting.

Difficulty of equalization is a whole 'nother animal. To model eq, I would also have to account for, among other things, air density variation with depth, and how that affects airflow resistance through the eustachian tubes. I am in no way trying to say that eq is the same at 70/full-lung as 30/half-lung, just that the volume of air in the lungs ends up the same.

By the way, feel free to "quibble." No harm, no foul.
 
Last edited:
Did a bit of research, and it appears that flow resistance increases linearly with density. All other things being equal, it should be harder to push air into the ears at 70 meters than at 30, or just take longer with the same force applied.
 
Your graphs are good for teaching. They illustrate very well the squeezing-dangers at depth.
 
DeeperBlue.com - The Worlds Largest Community Dedicated To Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing

ABOUT US

ISSN 1469-865X | Copyright © 1996 - 2024 deeperblue.net limited.

DeeperBlue.com is the World's Largest Community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving, Ocean Advocacy and Diving Travel.

We've been dedicated to bringing you the freshest news, features and discussions from around the underwater world since 1996.

ADVERT