A Study in Scarlet O-Rings - A Bit of Sherlockey Work
In preparation for fixing the internal leak I wanted to figure out what size rings these are, but trying to measure my old o-rings posed a challenge. Here are some from two guns from the bulkhead and pump inlet valve...:
For comparison, here is one of the funky seals with two regular o-rings:
Honestly, the first time I came across these seals I thought Mares might have used some proprietary flat-concave seals in the bulkhead and I feared I could never find replacements for these. But as most of you probably recognized, those pics are of what used to be a nice circular o-rings. They are just deformed like crazy now. When I realized that, of course, I was relieved as I could set about replacing them - just needed to find the sizes.
But nothing is supposed to be that easy...
I started looking at the old Mirage manuals and the exploded diagrams to look for clues on the sizes. Pete has covered this in the past but I had somehow forgotten about that (
just found it again yesterday) and it is amazing how the Mirage has changed over the years. It's also quite confusing;-)
In the first version, an AMF-Mares gun, going by this scan of Pete's original manual, the trigger o-ring uses one type of o-ring (OR 1) while the o-rings in the one-way valve, the over pressure valve and the pump inlet valve uses another type (OR 101):
In the next version, also an AMF-Mares branded gun, the same separation between two types of o-rings is present. But while the trigger o-ring stays the same (OR 1), the o-rings for the one-way valve, the over pressure valve and the pump inlet valve change to another spec from OR101 to OR2012 (Pete says it is an increase in hardness change):
In what I think might be the latest version from a 1989 Mares-only branded manual (thanks Jegwan), the o-rings in the one-way valve, the over pressure valve, the pump inlet valve
and the trigger are now the same spec - and they stick to the so-called 'OR 1' o-ring. Perhaps, Mares wanted to simplify the assembly:
Now, here's the thing. Mares never gave out the sizes of all these rings... They just gave these random parts numbers that I couldn't cross reference or relate to any real world sizes. At least I thought so until last night when, once again, I was roaming online. I don't know why I never thought of this but there's actually an Italian Standard for o-rings called UNI and... most of the Mares o-ring "part numbers" corresponds exactly to that standard!
Here's a screen shot of part of the list:
I was pretty chuffed when I came across that list, to say the least. For years, I have been pissed at Mares for not letting us know what their o-ring sizes were and then it turns out, they weren't really keeping secrets. Just sticking to a weird, old, illogical naming standard... haha
(I am making a spreadsheet with as many of these relevant sizes as I can - will share it in a new thread in a few days)
You would think this solved it, right? As e.g. the OR2012 ring is given as a 2.9 x 1.78mm (ID x W) according to the Italian UNI standard. That is a very regular AS568-006 o-ring that I have plenty of. But remember, Mares changed all those four seals to that strangely named 'OR 1' in the latest version (in some Mares manuals called OR R/1) and that is nowhere to be found in the Italian standard. Now, I actually speculate that that could refer to another standard, this time the French R O-ring Standard where there is an o-ring called R1 which is close enough in size that it makes sense (2.6 x 1.9mm):
So, I think I am getting there. It took a while and maybe I am taking a wild guess on the French R series but perhaps not.
Finally, there's also an important question of hardness as Mares have used different hardness of seals in different positions over time. But that is the next challenge.