In talking to a Performance Freediving clinic graduate, he mentioned that they were advised against doing negitive dives lasting more than 15 second(or hanging at depth for more than 15s proberbly). The reason they were given as far as he can remember, and from what it says in the manual was to do with plasma entering the lung, effecting O2 uptake. This apparenty being a reason why very deep divers only do one deep dive/day as it takes hours to dissapear.(if I remember correcrtly)
I've always been of the opinion that more negitive dives the better. I do at least 5 in my warmups, to about 12m, lasting about one minute, before deep dives. My theory has been that the more blood shift the better. And I would also have thought that this would reverse within the hour. (I'm taking here about normal pulmonary erection, not edema where the blood/plasma actually enters the lungs airspace and hinders O2 gass transfere)
I was also of the beleif that the only reasons for not doing repeat deep dives was lactic acid buildup and possible DCS.
Could Kirk/Martin be talking only about lung squeeze edema i.e coughing blood rather than just normal negitive pressure induced blood shunt? Can anyone else support the idea that to many/long empty lung dives can be a bad thing. This would be the first I've heard of such a theory. Thanks in advance
Bevan
just found the email in which I was told this theory, I'll include it because I didnt discribe 100%
quote: Plasma entering the lungs is
common for diving more than 120 feet, but can also happened by doing long
negatives at the bottom of a 15' pool._ It is not harmful, but takes some
hours to dissimulate out of the lungs and will negatively effect the volume
of air you can put in your lungs and the ability of the lungs to pull O2 out
of the air and into your blood until it dissimulates._ This is why real deep
divers only dive deep once a day.
I've always been of the opinion that more negitive dives the better. I do at least 5 in my warmups, to about 12m, lasting about one minute, before deep dives. My theory has been that the more blood shift the better. And I would also have thought that this would reverse within the hour. (I'm taking here about normal pulmonary erection, not edema where the blood/plasma actually enters the lungs airspace and hinders O2 gass transfere)
I was also of the beleif that the only reasons for not doing repeat deep dives was lactic acid buildup and possible DCS.
Could Kirk/Martin be talking only about lung squeeze edema i.e coughing blood rather than just normal negitive pressure induced blood shunt? Can anyone else support the idea that to many/long empty lung dives can be a bad thing. This would be the first I've heard of such a theory. Thanks in advance
Bevan
just found the email in which I was told this theory, I'll include it because I didnt discribe 100%
quote: Plasma entering the lungs is
common for diving more than 120 feet, but can also happened by doing long
negatives at the bottom of a 15' pool._ It is not harmful, but takes some
hours to dissimulate out of the lungs and will negatively effect the volume
of air you can put in your lungs and the ability of the lungs to pull O2 out
of the air and into your blood until it dissimulates._ This is why real deep
divers only dive deep once a day.
Last edited: