My experience with C4 80 Flaps and Spetton footpockets.
I am not quite happy with the fact that screw-heads are not in the same plane as the blade surface. :rcard
Spetton footpocket for 40-42 seems to be totaly different in shape from 42-44. Sock or no sock, they do not seem to be the right shape. I would not recommend them, but if anyone wants pair of Spetton footpockets 40-42, drop me PM. :rcard
Once you put blade into footpocket, it is not advisable to remove it as you'll damage the rubber (that is for C4, Waterways is fine). :rcard
I have to say that manufacturer kindly offered to replace damaged rubber, but I wonder if the new rubber will be any better. I am a bit dissapointed with very limited number of blade changes one can make (one in my case). :hmm
I also have to say that Waterways rubber on their fibreglass blades is by far superior to C4 and proves that it is possible to design this properly.
I would use this opportunity to ask for advice. Would it be possible to have C4 80 Flaps fitted into Waterways open-heel pockets (like those on the photo) ?
Could anyone recommend footpocket for C4 80 Flaps, to be worn with no socks? (I find Cressi Gara2000 shape very good).
In case that someone from Waterways reads this...could I buy rubber in question from you (so I would glue it to my C4 blades)?
I cannot comment on C4 80 Flap performance, as I haven't tried them with decent foot-pockets.