"16th July 2009
1. Hunts look forward to repeal
2. DEFRA abandoning small farmers?
3. Rural Action Plan
1. Hunts look forward to repeal
The Show season is now in full swing. I have been at Ardingly recently, the Great Yorkshire is on right now and we have the Peterborough Festival of Hunting in prospect next week with Honiton to be held in August. Add the Royal Welsh and the Game Fair and the opportunities for country people to discuss what the future holds are plenty.
And as we approach an election the talk is increasingly about the future of hunting, and thus the wider countryside. Four years ago we stated our intention to fight the ban and labelled the Hunting Act a temporary law. I was even reprimanded for suggesting that hunting's future was more secure than Alun Michael's ministerial one..
Few, even of those who hunt, can have really have believed how successful the campaign against the ban would be. The positive mood shows that there is real belief in the campaign for repeal, and that the long wait could be almost over. However, let's be wary of complacency.
The Hunting Act is unique in that its effects are entirely negative. It diminishes respect for Parliament; it puts law-abiding people at risk of prosecution; it diverts police attention from real crime; it brings no benefit to the environment; it is a blatant example of political prejudice, and it does nothing for the welfare or conservation of the species it claims to "protect". It has been the consistent and determined explanation of the case for repeal that has been the key. We must never miss an opportunity to do so, and nor should organisations such as Vote OK, which co-ordinates rural networks to support sensible candidates for Parliament.
Who knows who might win the next election? But to hear William Hague, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, speak at the Masters of Foxhounds Association annual meeting in June provided significant encouragement. Mr Hague could not have been clearer about the law or his party's plans for it: "A Conservative government will give Parliament the opportunity to repeal the Hunting Act on a free vote and in government time. This has been our position, and it will remain our position."
Importantly he explained the principles of why Governments should get rid of bad laws.
Increasing numbers of MPs and candidates from all parties understand that the law does not work and they are pledging their support to get rid of it. They also understand that, whatever they may think about hunting, the majority of people know that the law has not worked, and the UK media is now routinely calling for its demise.
So, on the eve of the Game Fair at Belvoir Castle we find ourselves as close as we have ever been to a victory in an extraordinary political battle; one that could change forever the relationship between Government and the countryside. The last furlong is, however, always the hardest and there are many obstacles still to negotiate. At the Great Yorkshire this week the hound show was moved right to the centre of the show, highlighting the fact that hunting is not separate but an integral part of the countryside. This is something our opponents have never understood, and a key part of why the Hunting Act has failed.
Simon Hart
Chief Executive
Repeal of the Hunting Act forms a key part of our Rural Manifesto, and you can sign up to it here
2. DEFRA abandoning small farmers?
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) is currently running a consultation which could see small farmers eliminated from subsidies.
DEFRA is currently holding a "Consultation on implementation of the CAP health check reforms relating to the Single Payment Scheme and other direct payments". It suggests making payments only to those with five hectares or more, rather one hectare or more as at present. The consultation document suggests "a higher minimum area would lead to greater annual administrative savings for the Rural Payments Agency (RPA) as they would have fewer claims to fully process and inspect.. Farmers who do not wish to lose their entitlements could lease or purchase additional entitlements".
Even by DEFRA's standards this suggestion is astonishing. It is not rocket science that by making the criteria harder fewer people will qualify and therefore fewer payments will have to be made, but if this suggestion is implemented it will deal a body blow to small farmers. I am also concerned that any savings made would not be invested in farming but would be used to pay off the RPA's administration debts. Small holders shouldn't foot the bill for repaying the RPA's blunders by being excluded from SPS payments.
Around about 45% of holdings across England alone are five hectares or less in size, many of them struggling in this economic climate. To suggest in such a cavalier manner that they can simply "lease or purchase additional entitlements" if they don't want to lose their payments is offensive. The farming community has been paying the price for the RPA's mismanagement for too long, but now to simply cut out the most vulnerable group of claimants shows a contempt for farming that we hoped we would never see.
The consultation closes on 22nd of July and anyone can respond here.
3. Rural Action Plan
The Conservative Party has recently published a new document entitled "Rural Action: A Conservative Agenda for Rural Communities." It outlines the party's plans for the countryside should it win the General Election. Rural Action focuses on four fronts:
1. Respect rural people - by regulating only where self-regulation fails
2. Power to rural communities - by reversing the centralised Whitehall decision making process
3. Protect rural services - by recognising social value alongside economic and environmental value
4. Revive the rural economy - by delivering sustainable jobs by reducing barriers to business growth
You can read the document here. We look forward to reporting on the other parties' plans for rural Britain in due course.
"
1. Hunts look forward to repeal
2. DEFRA abandoning small farmers?
3. Rural Action Plan
1. Hunts look forward to repeal
The Show season is now in full swing. I have been at Ardingly recently, the Great Yorkshire is on right now and we have the Peterborough Festival of Hunting in prospect next week with Honiton to be held in August. Add the Royal Welsh and the Game Fair and the opportunities for country people to discuss what the future holds are plenty.
And as we approach an election the talk is increasingly about the future of hunting, and thus the wider countryside. Four years ago we stated our intention to fight the ban and labelled the Hunting Act a temporary law. I was even reprimanded for suggesting that hunting's future was more secure than Alun Michael's ministerial one..
Few, even of those who hunt, can have really have believed how successful the campaign against the ban would be. The positive mood shows that there is real belief in the campaign for repeal, and that the long wait could be almost over. However, let's be wary of complacency.
The Hunting Act is unique in that its effects are entirely negative. It diminishes respect for Parliament; it puts law-abiding people at risk of prosecution; it diverts police attention from real crime; it brings no benefit to the environment; it is a blatant example of political prejudice, and it does nothing for the welfare or conservation of the species it claims to "protect". It has been the consistent and determined explanation of the case for repeal that has been the key. We must never miss an opportunity to do so, and nor should organisations such as Vote OK, which co-ordinates rural networks to support sensible candidates for Parliament.
Who knows who might win the next election? But to hear William Hague, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, speak at the Masters of Foxhounds Association annual meeting in June provided significant encouragement. Mr Hague could not have been clearer about the law or his party's plans for it: "A Conservative government will give Parliament the opportunity to repeal the Hunting Act on a free vote and in government time. This has been our position, and it will remain our position."
Importantly he explained the principles of why Governments should get rid of bad laws.
Increasing numbers of MPs and candidates from all parties understand that the law does not work and they are pledging their support to get rid of it. They also understand that, whatever they may think about hunting, the majority of people know that the law has not worked, and the UK media is now routinely calling for its demise.
So, on the eve of the Game Fair at Belvoir Castle we find ourselves as close as we have ever been to a victory in an extraordinary political battle; one that could change forever the relationship between Government and the countryside. The last furlong is, however, always the hardest and there are many obstacles still to negotiate. At the Great Yorkshire this week the hound show was moved right to the centre of the show, highlighting the fact that hunting is not separate but an integral part of the countryside. This is something our opponents have never understood, and a key part of why the Hunting Act has failed.
Simon Hart
Chief Executive
Repeal of the Hunting Act forms a key part of our Rural Manifesto, and you can sign up to it here
2. DEFRA abandoning small farmers?
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) is currently running a consultation which could see small farmers eliminated from subsidies.
DEFRA is currently holding a "Consultation on implementation of the CAP health check reforms relating to the Single Payment Scheme and other direct payments". It suggests making payments only to those with five hectares or more, rather one hectare or more as at present. The consultation document suggests "a higher minimum area would lead to greater annual administrative savings for the Rural Payments Agency (RPA) as they would have fewer claims to fully process and inspect.. Farmers who do not wish to lose their entitlements could lease or purchase additional entitlements".
Even by DEFRA's standards this suggestion is astonishing. It is not rocket science that by making the criteria harder fewer people will qualify and therefore fewer payments will have to be made, but if this suggestion is implemented it will deal a body blow to small farmers. I am also concerned that any savings made would not be invested in farming but would be used to pay off the RPA's administration debts. Small holders shouldn't foot the bill for repaying the RPA's blunders by being excluded from SPS payments.
Around about 45% of holdings across England alone are five hectares or less in size, many of them struggling in this economic climate. To suggest in such a cavalier manner that they can simply "lease or purchase additional entitlements" if they don't want to lose their payments is offensive. The farming community has been paying the price for the RPA's mismanagement for too long, but now to simply cut out the most vulnerable group of claimants shows a contempt for farming that we hoped we would never see.
The consultation closes on 22nd of July and anyone can respond here.
3. Rural Action Plan
The Conservative Party has recently published a new document entitled "Rural Action: A Conservative Agenda for Rural Communities." It outlines the party's plans for the countryside should it win the General Election. Rural Action focuses on four fronts:
1. Respect rural people - by regulating only where self-regulation fails
2. Power to rural communities - by reversing the centralised Whitehall decision making process
3. Protect rural services - by recognising social value alongside economic and environmental value
4. Revive the rural economy - by delivering sustainable jobs by reducing barriers to business growth
You can read the document here. We look forward to reporting on the other parties' plans for rural Britain in due course.
"