• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 47,943+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 531,990+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,455+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

Eqex

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 90 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

perow1

New Member
Feb 28, 2005
279
22
0
I cannot seem to conclude what you all think of the EQEX. I think it is a smart invention but i am not as sure about where I think it should be allowed. Static - No
CWT - Hesitating but leaning towards NO (to many gadgets)
No Limit - Well, yes (from the name) but i still do not fancy it as much as going without.
 
My vote would be:

Pool diciplines: no, unless little pony bottles are allowed as well
Depth: maybe, don't really care
No-Limits: sure, why not. Fluid goggles, nose clips, pipe masks and all the "gadgeds" have pretty much always been allowed. This is no different...
 
Last edited:
Well, I think there is a difference between the Equex and the stuff you mentioned.
Latter, apart from the noseclip, try to overcome a problem that is caused by equipment, namely that you need a mask which normally would be filled with air etc. etc. . You would be actually better off not taking a mask at all, which isn't possible for obvious reasons. The noseclip is rather for streamlining not for equalization (if you can do the equalization with noseclip on you could do it using your hands as well).
The Equex takes it one step further - it is a piece of equipment solely designed to overcome the shortcomings of human physiology.
Jm2cc.
 
I will have to agree with Veronika. It is a tool to overcome the shortcomings of human physiology. Thats the case with fins and suits as well. I must say i admire the no fins disciplines the most. What is the case with suits? Maybe freediving in is pure form is supposed to be done as we were born...
....in the nude with no equipment what so ever ;)
 
The EQEX makes a simple maneuver safer. You can do a giant mouthfill without the EQEX. You have to blow air into your cupped hands, and trap the air under them (at the moment of final mouthfill).

Then, at a deeper depth, you suck the air trapped by your hands back into your mouth. This is obviously a risky maneuver, but possible. So the EQEX method of equalizing is actually possible even without the device.
 
Or run a small pipe to your hood (going down upright), blow the air in there and suck it out later :)

And instead of cupped hands, it might be easier to use your glove or something...If it's intact, it can be used as a balloon basically...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeepThought
DeeperBlue.com - The Worlds Largest Community Dedicated To Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing

ABOUT US

ISSN 1469-865X | Copyright © 1996 - 2026 DeeperBlue Global Media Limited.

DeeperBlue.com is an independent digital media platform dedicated to Scuba Diving, Freediving, Ocean Advocacy, and Dive Travel.

Since 1996, we’ve been informing, educating, and inspiring the global diving community through trusted news, features, and shared community experience.

ADVERT