A theory for thought. (safety issues aside)
Most, when asked reply that hyperventilation is dangerous ( couldnt agree more ) and ineffective.
This theory proposes that hyperventilation is very effective (and dangerous.)
Hyperventilation by rapid and deep breathing ie a breath a second for a minute will extend a breath hold performance by up to 100%. This is achieved by making the limit of loss of consciousness more approachable but not by moving the limit of loss of consciousness.
Mechanically the need to breathe is caused by Co2 Build-up. This need to breathe stumulus can be depressed by blowing off much Co2. O2 loading is insignificant ? during hyperventilation.
Danger is when the Oxygen level reaches a too low level and the brain switches off before the rising Co2 level makes it intolerable to continue breath- hold.
Fear of not being able to make the return trip from the depths and the 'pain' of oxygen hunger is usually what mentally and physically limits a apnea performance. Equalisation problems aside.
Few divers continiously press right up to the limit of loss of consciousness. It stands to reason that reducing a need to breathe will extend the depth and time performance of most divers by reducing fear and pain, by extending comfort during the performance.
Yes, overcoming those mental blocks is much of what freediving is about but can hyperventilation be denied as an effective, and i will say again, but dangerous tool ?
Hyperventilation in itself is not dangerous but seeing as how by extending the comfort of the apnea period one may stray over the low oxygen shutdown limit, its practice is dangerous.
Hyperventilation will not speed the onset of Blackout nor will it delay it. It will however make the journey there more comfortable and participants with fluke good timing will enjoy generally greater successes. Those with inevitable bad timing will inevitably die.
What about in competition where safety is at its best and death unlikely ? Surely hyperventilation will provide good results amongst the increase in SWB ?
Is the accepted ' breathing- up' as practiced by most, not just an extended / mild form of hyperventilation?
Does anyone dispute the effectiveness aspect of this theory?
Having raised some curiosities.. please dont ever hyperventilate. It will kill you.
Most, when asked reply that hyperventilation is dangerous ( couldnt agree more ) and ineffective.
This theory proposes that hyperventilation is very effective (and dangerous.)
Hyperventilation by rapid and deep breathing ie a breath a second for a minute will extend a breath hold performance by up to 100%. This is achieved by making the limit of loss of consciousness more approachable but not by moving the limit of loss of consciousness.
Mechanically the need to breathe is caused by Co2 Build-up. This need to breathe stumulus can be depressed by blowing off much Co2. O2 loading is insignificant ? during hyperventilation.
Danger is when the Oxygen level reaches a too low level and the brain switches off before the rising Co2 level makes it intolerable to continue breath- hold.
Fear of not being able to make the return trip from the depths and the 'pain' of oxygen hunger is usually what mentally and physically limits a apnea performance. Equalisation problems aside.
Few divers continiously press right up to the limit of loss of consciousness. It stands to reason that reducing a need to breathe will extend the depth and time performance of most divers by reducing fear and pain, by extending comfort during the performance.
Yes, overcoming those mental blocks is much of what freediving is about but can hyperventilation be denied as an effective, and i will say again, but dangerous tool ?
Hyperventilation in itself is not dangerous but seeing as how by extending the comfort of the apnea period one may stray over the low oxygen shutdown limit, its practice is dangerous.
Hyperventilation will not speed the onset of Blackout nor will it delay it. It will however make the journey there more comfortable and participants with fluke good timing will enjoy generally greater successes. Those with inevitable bad timing will inevitably die.
What about in competition where safety is at its best and death unlikely ? Surely hyperventilation will provide good results amongst the increase in SWB ?
Is the accepted ' breathing- up' as practiced by most, not just an extended / mild form of hyperventilation?
Does anyone dispute the effectiveness aspect of this theory?
Having raised some curiosities.. please dont ever hyperventilate. It will kill you.