• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 47,943+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 531,990+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,455+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

slipstream mask

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 90 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

jimmyv

New Member
Sep 10, 2006
4
0
0
77
I am a beginner, but I have to ask. Why aren't there any freedive masks made that are hydrodynamic? Seems like it would eliminate a measure of drag and resistance if some extra silicone was added to round out the contours around the lenses.
 
Thanks Jon,
But it seems it could be more streamlined (maybe this would only matter to competitive freedivers).
Suppose they added silicone from the top of each lens to the edge of the skirt. The mask could be made to have no edge, sort of like a fish's eye.

Also (I know this would look silly) why not have a cone shaped hood insert for competitive freediving? Seems like it would help a diver knife through the water better than a blunt surface like my noggin.

Most fish I've seen diving are way more hydrodynamic than we are.
 
There are many reasons masks are not streamlined like you say. Mainly because it doesn't make any difference to most snorkelers and scuba divers, and this is who buys 99.99% of masks. Other reasons are that all the mask parts are molded and if the molded parts are thick they cost way more, they use more material and take much much longer to cool in the mold so the tooling production cost is much much higher. Also using foam does not work for this thick part as it will compress so would have to use solid rubber so would be heavy too and wouldn't conform well to your face for different face builds so would need to be more customized. This is not to say it wouldn't be nice to have a very streamlined mask though.

Cheers Wes
 
Well, if you are going for a record in dynamic or depth apnea, and think that the streamlines of your mask limits you too much, try it without mask. The round head most of us have, is already not too bad from hydrodynamic point of view. Much better than if you were a cone-head - the construction concept of cone shape of some ancient submarines (i.e. the Nautilus of Capt. Nemo in Jules Verne's books) was overpassed by modern submarines with round heads. Also larger boats are being equipped by round noses that improve their hydrodynamics greatly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pat fish
DeeperBlue.com - The Worlds Largest Community Dedicated To Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing

ABOUT US

ISSN 1469-865X | Copyright © 1996 - 2026 DeeperBlue Global Media Limited.

DeeperBlue.com is an independent digital media platform dedicated to Scuba Diving, Freediving, Ocean Advocacy, and Dive Travel.

Since 1996, we’ve been informing, educating, and inspiring the global diving community through trusted news, features, and shared community experience.

ADVERT