Another perspective or view shown here.As I have posted this info on the self-aligning seat for the vacuum cuff in the "Taimen" muzzle elsewhere I decided to add it here as well for any future reference.
Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
Another perspective or view shown here.As I have posted this info on the self-aligning seat for the vacuum cuff in the "Taimen" muzzle elsewhere I decided to add it here as well for any future reference.
...
Maybe this decoupling of the spear tail at the piston face could be utilized in other vacuum barrel spearguns which do use single flopper, integral tip spears if you want to twist the shaft to maintain the same rotational orientation of the shaft in the gun for every shot. That would then eliminate the possibility of misfires caused by shaft twisting which can disengage the hooking action of the sear tooth on the piston tail.
I think that the shaft has much better support in a cone tail end and cone in a piston thus being better aligned and supported by the piston what makes bending of the shaft during acceleration lesser. Oscillations of the shaft continues during the flight of the spear through water taking of its energy and precision.Maybe you could elaborate on why that would be as the extreme shaft tail would be a cylinder rather than a taper, but otherwise nothing changes.
Well the tail still sits in the centre of the piston face as the cylindrical rear end, or peg, fits into a hole the same size as the peg, but with a tiny clearance so it does not jam in place. The main limitation would be if the spear was too heavy to be supported by the vacuum opposing the spear falling out of the inner barrel. I remember working out the figures for the shaft diameter and mass versus the supporting effect from the vacuum in an earlier post which is probably on this thread. That was for at the surface, but the deeper the gun is submerged then the more external pressure there is to support the shaft. The longest "Taimen" is a 1200 mm, although it may have been a "special" as I don't recall it being listed in their catalogue, but it appears on the gun dimensions table. Given how "Taimen" measure their guns it would be a 1150 mm if you remove the length of the raked handle.
That is a case I am talking about, slim longer lengths spears. Acceleration in pneumatic spear gun is about 700 m/s2 (gravity is 9.81 m/s2). I believe that firm grip between piston and shaft is beneficial and could dampen eventually bending....
Although we cannot see it I suspect that very slim spears at longer lengths do bow inside the bore of an inner barrel when being driven up to a high velocity, but the centralizing washer and the close fit of the muzzle help to minimize or dampen any effects as the spear leaves the gun and the piston pushing hard on the spear tail immobilizes it with respect to the piston. If you think about it the spear tail to piston connection is transmitting all the propulsive force to the spear, so relative movement there is next to impossible as the acceleration pushes them tightly together.
Well we have to disagree on this one as I don't see how that would work from a mechanical viewpoint. Holding a long thin rod at its rear end will not stop it from vibrating. I think this vibration of a shaft in a pneumatic speargun is a non-problem anyway and not worth worrying about. The mid-point of a shaft is free to move laterally even if the ends are fixed, hence if vibration amplitude was large enough to pose a problem then that movement would need to be confined by having a close-fitting inner barrel.That is a case I am talking about, slim longer lengths spears. Acceleration in pneumatic spear gun is about 700 m/s2 (gravity is 9.81 m/s2). I believe that firm grip between piston and shaft is beneficial and could dampen eventually bending.
Well we have to disagree on this one as I don't see how that would work from a mechanical viewpoint. Holding a long thin rod at its rear end will not stop it from vibrating. I think this vibration of a shaft in a pneumatic speargun is a non-problem anyway and not worth worrying about. The mid-point of a shaft is free to move laterally even if the ends are fixed, hence if vibration amplitude was large enough to pose a problem then that movement would need to be confined by having a close-fitting inner barrel.
An example of an unsupported spear that may vibrate is in the piston-less spearguns like the "Vlanik", but there the spear moves through a longer guide tube in a very close fitting muzzle which may suppress any vibration as the spear emerges from the gun.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?