Simplified told, the trendlines show linearized average interpolation relationship between the two disciplines. Or even simpler - the line in the field of points, it is as if you were trying to cut a loaf of bread into two halves of the same weight. The line tries to go through the field of data in the same way, while being anchored in the zero point (the previous series of graphs did not have the start point fixed, hence could chose the ideal "cut" better).
The X/Y ratio then shows the average ratio between the two disciplines (or the steepness of the line), and the R2 expresses the goodness of fit (how well the data fits to the idealized linear formula).
The graphs show the following global averaged correlations between disciplines:
DYN = 136.5% of DNF (DNF = 73.3% of DYN)
CWT = 139.6% of CNF (CNF = 71.7% of CWT)
DYN = 232.5% of the CWT depth (CWT depth = 43.0% of DYN)
DYN = 116.3% of the CWT distance (CWT distance = 86.0% of DYN)
I'll look into the STA correlations, but since I do this manually (need to manipulate the huge data, generate and format the graphs, convert to images, upload them,...), it always takes a bit work and time. I actually wanted to add this graphs to the online interface, so that they can be generated automatically for selected club, gender, country, continent, or region, and chosen time span, and also wanted to add the evolution of the ratio in time for individuals or groups. It will require some more work and time though, so cannot tell when it happens. If any scientist is interested in the graphs, or want other graphs or statistics, they can contact me anytime, of course.
The X/Y ratio then shows the average ratio between the two disciplines (or the steepness of the line), and the R2 expresses the goodness of fit (how well the data fits to the idealized linear formula).
The graphs show the following global averaged correlations between disciplines:
DYN = 136.5% of DNF (DNF = 73.3% of DYN)
CWT = 139.6% of CNF (CNF = 71.7% of CWT)
DYN = 232.5% of the CWT depth (CWT depth = 43.0% of DYN)
DYN = 116.3% of the CWT distance (CWT distance = 86.0% of DYN)
I'll look into the STA correlations, but since I do this manually (need to manipulate the huge data, generate and format the graphs, convert to images, upload them,...), it always takes a bit work and time. I actually wanted to add this graphs to the online interface, so that they can be generated automatically for selected club, gender, country, continent, or region, and chosen time span, and also wanted to add the evolution of the ratio in time for individuals or groups. It will require some more work and time though, so cannot tell when it happens. If any scientist is interested in the graphs, or want other graphs or statistics, they can contact me anytime, of course.
Last edited: