Re: Back to physics class
Actually, this is not really the case(with all due respect, Joe). I think people put their arms at their side for a more comfortable posture and to conserve oxygen(by not having to support your arms).
Optimizing speed in water is more about maximizing laminar flow. And... this comes when the maximum diameter of the object is near the back third(with rear propulsion). However, this does follow the requirement that the body has a length to height ratio of about 5. The best example of this is the Tuna. But, as the length to height ratio increases, the maximum diameter moves forward. But, in contrast to a raindrop, the best reduction in turbulence comes from a piercing point at the front. This minimizes eddy currents and creates a laminar flow.
So, I think being able to conserve that much more oxygen outweighs the loss in speed due to the drop in arms/hands. So then conclusively, the raindrop shape is not the most hydrodynamically efficient, but for some, it may be the most effective.
Sorry to sound like a lecture, but I had a few Ocean Engineering courses that covered this stuff.
Cheers,
Anderson
Originally posted by groats
The most efficient form is the one that looks like a raindrop and not the long and slim form, so extended arms are hydrodynamically less effective than arms behind.
Dive often, joe
Actually, this is not really the case(with all due respect, Joe). I think people put their arms at their side for a more comfortable posture and to conserve oxygen(by not having to support your arms).
Optimizing speed in water is more about maximizing laminar flow. And... this comes when the maximum diameter of the object is near the back third(with rear propulsion). However, this does follow the requirement that the body has a length to height ratio of about 5. The best example of this is the Tuna. But, as the length to height ratio increases, the maximum diameter moves forward. But, in contrast to a raindrop, the best reduction in turbulence comes from a piercing point at the front. This minimizes eddy currents and creates a laminar flow.
So, I think being able to conserve that much more oxygen outweighs the loss in speed due to the drop in arms/hands. So then conclusively, the raindrop shape is not the most hydrodynamically efficient, but for some, it may be the most effective.
Sorry to sound like a lecture, but I had a few Ocean Engineering courses that covered this stuff.
Cheers,
Anderson