Hey Pete,
I just started thinking that if you want to test the importance of static tables, you should perform an experiment where you have relatively inexperienced individuals who try both approaches to developing static ability---with and without the aid of static tables.
I am definitely a beginner or amateur apneist (only one year of freediving with any dedication). Like I mentioned before, I am pleased on how I've done with little apnea-specific training so far (best CW depth = 120ft). In the interest of serving as your "non-static tables" guinea pig, I thought I'd try a dry static this morning (only my second time doing this), and I managed to reach 5:46 on my second of three intended attempts. I felt pretty sure I'd nail 6:00 on my third attempt, but I lost the willpower (which is what I feel that static apnea really boils down to, just like the endurance sports I do; how far are you willing to push yourself?). I was applying some of the advice from 'jome', measuring the length of my struggle phase (2:54), and counting my contractions in order to try to reach a higher goal number of contractions each attempt (reached 70 contractions on the 5:46, 80 on a subsequent but somehow shorter one).
My dive partner, 'fishon'/Derek LeVault, just told me he hit a ~7:00 dry static the other day, and I'm pretty sure he doesn't do static tables regularly (may have tried them before though).
I'm going to continue attempting to do dry statics every week, without doing any static tables (i.e., just attempting ~3 max attempts every time). Maybe when I plateau I'll attempt some static tables, although it's been pointed out that the static tables probably help the beginners through the more amateur times (< 5:00?) more than they help the experienced with the tougher times (> 6:00?). Not sure where you guys draw the line between amateur and respectable, but I feel like surpassing 6:00 would promote me to the respectable category.
I just started thinking that if you want to test the importance of static tables, you should perform an experiment where you have relatively inexperienced individuals who try both approaches to developing static ability---with and without the aid of static tables.
I am definitely a beginner or amateur apneist (only one year of freediving with any dedication). Like I mentioned before, I am pleased on how I've done with little apnea-specific training so far (best CW depth = 120ft). In the interest of serving as your "non-static tables" guinea pig, I thought I'd try a dry static this morning (only my second time doing this), and I managed to reach 5:46 on my second of three intended attempts. I felt pretty sure I'd nail 6:00 on my third attempt, but I lost the willpower (which is what I feel that static apnea really boils down to, just like the endurance sports I do; how far are you willing to push yourself?). I was applying some of the advice from 'jome', measuring the length of my struggle phase (2:54), and counting my contractions in order to try to reach a higher goal number of contractions each attempt (reached 70 contractions on the 5:46, 80 on a subsequent but somehow shorter one).
My dive partner, 'fishon'/Derek LeVault, just told me he hit a ~7:00 dry static the other day, and I'm pretty sure he doesn't do static tables regularly (may have tried them before though).
I'm going to continue attempting to do dry statics every week, without doing any static tables (i.e., just attempting ~3 max attempts every time). Maybe when I plateau I'll attempt some static tables, although it's been pointed out that the static tables probably help the beginners through the more amateur times (< 5:00?) more than they help the experienced with the tougher times (> 6:00?). Not sure where you guys draw the line between amateur and respectable, but I feel like surpassing 6:00 would promote me to the respectable category.