Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
As a safety diver who has waited for unknown divers at 20m, I really, really, really don't want to do a rescue from there. I will, but I will lose respect for any diver who had a problem because they "thought they could do it" but had never done so before.
And any blackout below 20m better be a serious error on the part of the organizer (line too deep) or a giant jellyfish getting in the way.
I would rather like to know what was doing the brushed off left hand of the left freediver.Back to an off-topic topic. WHAT, exactly, is the guy on the right (in the photo above) looking at?
(where no safety protocols are in place, ie training dives)
A mistake in freediving does not hurt.
I have been thinking a lot about this because I may have upset Sam (sorry Sam) its been on my mind. And you are right. A perfect dive in a competition must fulfill all the criteria. By manipulating the criteria (excluding the tag grab) is almost intentionally cheating. My theory and practice, tries to exclude the tag grab in order to be able to go deeper, sacrificing points just to get deeper and therefore gain more than you lose, rather than run out of line.
Another rule states you must subscribe your depth. My theory tries to by pass that rule too, by being able to change your mind half way through the dive and so get deeper. A competition dive should not allow this change of mind because the whole idea of subscribing your depth is designed as a safety factor to stop you going deeper than you otherwise might. If for instance you had to get extra metres because your competitor subscribed and achieved deeper, forcing you to be gung ho.
I think I have had my mind changed.
Back to an off-topic topic. WHAT, exactly, is the guy on the right (in the photo above) looking at?