EXA
A gun without a track can be just as accurate as a gun with a track, believe it or not. Steve Alexander, an old Long Beach Neptune who invented the Enclosed Track for blue water hunting guns, said so himself. You can search his findings on this site.
There were guys building fully ballasted blue water guns that were extremely accurate in the 80’s with 6 or more bands, but they weighed 20lbs. That’s because if a gun is strait and stable the shaft should rest flat on the surface of the gun between the handle and the muzzle. So if it doesn’t flex why would it be any less accurate? Think about that.
That is not the problem with the Graphite 116. the absence of a semi enclosed track just makes the flex of the tube more obvious in that gun as Hugo can clearly see for himself doing that simple test I described in my first post on this thread.
Clear waters,
EXACTLY. So adding a track would do nothing to this gun to improve the accuracy.Yep and it shouldn’t be there. And there is no easy way of fixing that unless you are going to rebuild it.
A gun without a track can be just as accurate as a gun with a track, believe it or not. Steve Alexander, an old Long Beach Neptune who invented the Enclosed Track for blue water hunting guns, said so himself. You can search his findings on this site.
There were guys building fully ballasted blue water guns that were extremely accurate in the 80’s with 6 or more bands, but they weighed 20lbs. That’s because if a gun is strait and stable the shaft should rest flat on the surface of the gun between the handle and the muzzle. So if it doesn’t flex why would it be any less accurate? Think about that.
That is not the problem with the Graphite 116. the absence of a semi enclosed track just makes the flex of the tube more obvious in that gun as Hugo can clearly see for himself doing that simple test I described in my first post on this thread.
Clear waters,