I think I wasn't too clear on my responses - the heat of the moment thing ya know...
To play devils advocate for a moment: Why would I need to be liberal in my POV? Aren't my actions (or yours) capable of potentially affecting those around us? By being involved in personal relationships, aren't we therefore affecting those who choose to care for us? And if those who care for us - aren't we therefore affecting their emotional well being by practicing poor judgement?
I am not saying that I am responsible for others happiness - they need to be secure in themselves - but it is a fine line drawn between pushing the envelope and going over the edge in terms of good decision making - especially in an activity such as ours. My wife understands that what I do in freediving has an inherant risk - she also knows that I care about her more than the sport and that I would not do anything that would jeopordize my life.
That is making a good decision about what I do. That doesn't make me any better - far from it. But I do feel that freedivers who take the time to understand more about what they are doing, make informed decisions, and then deal with the ramifications of their actions are far more likely to dive safely than those who do just enough to let them say "I did this" or "I did that".
The sport of diving is a male dominated sport statistically (something like 85 - 90%) and as such will more than likely have guys who are thinking more with their "manhood" than with thier brains.
I can understand your tone regarding how I answered many of my posts - but unless an advocate (unofficial) at least puts the idea out there - no matter how much it will ruffle a few feathers, then we will just "coast along" as we have already, without forcing us to "think more deeply" about the sport, how we participate, etc. - and end up with more divers who die due to poor decision making.
I wasn't trying to sound elitist - far from it. I think much of the intent get's lost in the sterile tone of text on the screen. I, for one, enjoy seeing newcomers to the sport - to see them react the way I did the first times I went freediving and to see the excitement on their faces. To know that they will be participating in a sport that is simplicity in appearance, yet complex underneath.
I still get a kick out of hearing tank divers rant about the size of my fins when I go diving - I think of it as "Fin Envy"
Well - a good night's sleep has helped me to re-examine my position and how I responded. I hope that this response clarified those concern's you have. Let me know if you are still unclear on some of these issues.
To play devils advocate for a moment: Why would I need to be liberal in my POV? Aren't my actions (or yours) capable of potentially affecting those around us? By being involved in personal relationships, aren't we therefore affecting those who choose to care for us? And if those who care for us - aren't we therefore affecting their emotional well being by practicing poor judgement?
I am not saying that I am responsible for others happiness - they need to be secure in themselves - but it is a fine line drawn between pushing the envelope and going over the edge in terms of good decision making - especially in an activity such as ours. My wife understands that what I do in freediving has an inherant risk - she also knows that I care about her more than the sport and that I would not do anything that would jeopordize my life.
That is making a good decision about what I do. That doesn't make me any better - far from it. But I do feel that freedivers who take the time to understand more about what they are doing, make informed decisions, and then deal with the ramifications of their actions are far more likely to dive safely than those who do just enough to let them say "I did this" or "I did that".
The sport of diving is a male dominated sport statistically (something like 85 - 90%) and as such will more than likely have guys who are thinking more with their "manhood" than with thier brains.
I can understand your tone regarding how I answered many of my posts - but unless an advocate (unofficial) at least puts the idea out there - no matter how much it will ruffle a few feathers, then we will just "coast along" as we have already, without forcing us to "think more deeply" about the sport, how we participate, etc. - and end up with more divers who die due to poor decision making.
- I absolutely agree 110% with you on this - and I think my mind was racing faster than I could type and missed this in my responses.I think rather than try to restrict the freedom of people, we should be personally responsible as freedivers, meaning that we should do our best to disseminate accurate information in a reliable way. Perhaps our organizations could collect reliable information, agree upon it by consensus of members and "experts," and then offer it as the view of that organization (keeping in mind the liability issues). Folks would then know that that information has some weight behind it.
- again I agree - My intent was more about getting the basic information and then doing the necessary followup to get actual, accredited information that could be backed up or refuted.I specificially would NOT recommend that someone educate himself by simply punching up terms on an internet search engine. I think that is actually an irresponsible way of finding good information. I rely on electronic information finding for my scientific consulting business and hire professionals to assist me - believe me, the internet is NOT the way to go here. There is no way to determine what is good versus bad information on the internet. People have to remember that the internet is a free-for-all in terms of ideas - bad ideas do not come with a label. There is no "truth-in-information policy" on the internet.
- EXACTLY! - Kirk Krack is offering through his Performance Freedive Clinics a new beginners freediving class that allows those interested in the sport to get first hand instruction in the basics, while also giving the necessary academics needed to make better informed decisions about freediving.So, I think there is a role here for certification and for freediving organizations to really help the sport. I would be the first in line for a good course if it were affordable and I had some assurance it provided information I don't already have, and I would volunteer time to help organize these things and become a certified instructor. BUT, moving toward restrictions on people is something I would fight tooth and nail. It would be bad for freedivers and ultimately bad for the very sport you are trying to promote.
I wasn't trying to sound elitist - far from it. I think much of the intent get's lost in the sterile tone of text on the screen. I, for one, enjoy seeing newcomers to the sport - to see them react the way I did the first times I went freediving and to see the excitement on their faces. To know that they will be participating in a sport that is simplicity in appearance, yet complex underneath.
I still get a kick out of hearing tank divers rant about the size of my fins when I go diving - I think of it as "Fin Envy"
Well - a good night's sleep has helped me to re-examine my position and how I responded. I hope that this response clarified those concern's you have. Let me know if you are still unclear on some of these issues.
Last edited: