Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
Reminds me of that staggering news story about the US army's air-conditioning bill in Afghanistan each year: $20billionHeres a fact, if the US had to pay back all the money it owes around the world for its military debt alone it would have an economy on par with a 3rd world nation.
Good point, I should have provided a Federalization option, whereby all members of the Euro-zone (or perhaps all members of the EU) are run by a single European government, setting policy, taxes and laws.... However I do not think the poll is relevant for indicating the solution to it.
European leaders (eh ....) should advocate an economic union instead of a mere monetary one. The way things stand now, bankers hold the strings and puppets (all the rest...) are just playing in their show....
...
Yes , the bankers are milking us all dry by suckering the governments/taxpayers into taking on the costs of their mistakes. "Privatizing profits and socializing losses" :vangry...The way things stand now, bankers hold the strings and puppets (all the rest...) are just playing in their show...
"I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the Bank. ... You are a den of vipers and thieves."
— US President Andrew Jackson, 1834, on closing the Second Bank of the United States
Of course, Federalization in and of itself will make no difference. Economic policy would be developed centrally - but how would it be enforced? Greece & the PIIGS (& most other EU countries) would still need to cut back government spending, deficit (the over-spend each year) and debt (the cumulative debt so far).Good point, I should have provided a Federalization option, whereby all members of the Euro-zone (or perhaps all members of the EU) are run by a single European government, setting policy, taxes and laws.
I guess I find the idea so abhorrent *for Britain* that I've censored the possibility from my mind. But if the Euro-zone powers prefer to be governed centrally, then more power to them - just leave us out . ...
Of course, Federalization in and of itself will make no difference. Economic policy would be developed centrally - but how would it be enforced? Greece & the PIIGS (& most other EU countries) would still need to cut back government spending, deficit (the over-spend each year) and debt (the cumulative debt so far).Good point, I should have provided a Federalization option, whereby all members of the Euro-zone (or perhaps all members of the EU) are run by a single European government, setting policy, taxes and laws.
I guess I find the idea so abhorrent *for Britain* that I've censored the possibility from my mind. But if the Euro-zone powers prefer to be governed centrally, then more power to them - just leave us out . ...
I say we should vote in Apneaboy as European President, and then we could blame him for the lot!martial:crutch
Mate, i'd sort out the world problems, there wouldn't be that many left to whinge about my policies
Aaarrrr Apenaboys democratic dictatorship, liking yer style.
I'm your man for bulk cheap ammo :martial:blackeyeroflrofl
Good to know. Do you stock anything in the 500 kiloton region?
Want to be finished before I go on holiday.
Listening to BBC Radio 4 last night the female correspondent described the Euro-crisis as like train wreck happening in slow motion (or was a car crash?).
Several pundits have said they are currently just buying time, not solving the underlying problems. Real sad (& somewhat surprised) to see Italy dragged into this too.
How much more money will they throw at this before facing up to the politically unpalatable reality, and the markets? All countries (inc. UK) eventually have to face the reality of spending at levels they can afford.
Germany leaving the euro would help lower its value to sustainable levels - but they are currently paying to prop up the PIIGS. (from the profits of their artificially cheap exports). Can't see, say, France wanting to take that on - but with a lower value it should no longer be necessary (at least on the current scale).
I still think the Northern Euro/Southern Euro idea has considerable appeal. Allowing weaker economies to devalue their currency to a sustainable level, while allowing the stronger economies prices to rise (making them less competitive). Over time, countries might move between the two if their economies change significantly.
I guess a third option is that some or all of the PIIGS simply return to their old currencies, which they can devalue as they please. I was surprised to hear a story about Ireland/Sinn Fein considering joining the pound sterling rather than reintroducing their own currency (43% of Sinn Fein voters want to return to Sterling standard… « Slugger O'Toole) - not sure what all the implications of that might be but good to see we are apparently on much better terms these days.