Also just a query on your statement that undulating has drag advantages, to my knowledge the fastest and most efficient swimmers are the thunniform group , this group is characterised by minimal body pitching, with the tail fin being the only part that moves substantially.
Take a look at this training video:
I'm the one using the DOL-Fin hydrofoil fin. Notice how my technique using a monofin core undulation with minimal knee bend produces a thunniform swimming style. In contract, the diver with the hyperfin has a technique more like Goran Colak's with a significant amount of knee bend, which results in a swimming style closer to subcarangiform, or carangiform motion.
The difference between the squat motion and a kick motion is that in the squatting technique over the stoke you barely break perfect form , drag wise.... With your fin the dolfin unlike other standard monofins I believe you can use a technique that has a similar drag profile to that of a the squatting motion, but I believe you can only do it by putting in less power, for freediving purposes this probably doesn't matter as you don't put in full power, but for other types of swimming where putting in max effort for max speed is prefered it does.
This is how I see it:
Core Undulation = Thunniform style with minimal drag
Squating Motion = carangifirm (similar to thunniform core undulation but with breaks in streamlining at the butt, and at the knee bend).
Knee dominated kick = subcarangiform (more movement at the front and large break in streamlining at the knee bend).
Freediving is best with core undulation. Scuba diving works best with the squating motion because the tank restricts spinal movement and creates a wake that counteracts any benefits of the thunniform motion. The power input is related to the speed and frequency of the fin stroke, not the amplitude. The amplitude should be held relatively constant, regardless of the power input.
Last edited: