• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 44,280+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 516,210+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,441+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

saudi woman beheaded for witchcraft

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 60 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

jtkwest

recreational user
Dec 2, 2007
808
144
0
check out the "justice" lol
Saudi Woman Beheaded for 'Witchcraft' - Yahoo! News

this has become a growing problem! ever since the saudi's got hbo and started watching true blood , now they are after vampires and witches.
i guess we should be glad, they have progressed from the stone ages to the salem witch trials of the 1600's. its progress after all!
i know its not politically correct and there will be a bunch of offended people all " up in arms" over my post.
but this one is just crazy! beheading someone for witchcraft!
really! how do you prove witchcraft exactly?
i guess thats exactly the point= you dont HAVE to PROVE witchcraft.
evidently, you just accuse someone, and "its a wrap" lol
its like that monte python skit from the holy grail
" we found a witch may we burn her?"
"well- how do you know shes a witch?"
" she turned me into a newt"
......................................"I got better"
 
Their country and their laws... I guess they woman knew the outcome she would face. And she probably had the option of modern judicial system or sharia law court.
 
That’s just what I need, a witch, maybe she could fix my bust phone and get all my contacts, numbers and address back for me.
Don’t know why I didn’t think of it sooner.
Good job I don’t live over there, having red hair I’d have been burnt at the stake years ago.:blackeye

Sorry and yes I do feel sorry for the witch involved and her family, as for the idiots that decided her fate well what is there to say…..:rcard:rcard
 
Their country and their laws... I guess they woman knew the outcome she would face. And she probably had the option of modern judicial system or sharia law court.

exactly what i was going to say!!
she had options after all? really?
thats your take on this? SHE had a choice, and an option?
she was beheaded for witchcraft!
i guess if you are actually ridiculous enough to believe she actually WAS a witch,
i guess all this would make perfect sense. The problem here is: there is no such thing as witches.
is there? (bitches=yes but witches?)
"modern judicial system"? somehow i doubt that.
lol


is there?
 
Last edited:
Well, in the time I have lived in Riyadh it was quite clear what was acceptable and what was not. The matawa (religious police) would wander aimlessly through the souqs and shopping complex's (under heavy armed gaurd) and 'police' sharia law.
All the ladies would have the abaya hanging loosly over thier shoulders and when a matawa was spotted (hundreds of metres away) the shop owner would give everyone a heads up and the ladies would rush to comply (generally cover their skin and hair, safer still was to completely cover your head and the men would remain docile and accecpt whatever abuse was thrown at the women. The armed guards prevented the men from responding in any way.

But hey... we were guests in that country and we complied with their culture. There is far more good there from the people who live there than gets sensationally reported in the press. Its a fact that the crime rate there is near 0 and its a very safe place to live. On the flip side I have seen the dead and mutalated body's strung up from the central squares (chop chop square as its called) in central Riyadh. And it aint pretty but sharia law is fair in some regards and nothing is done without a solid reason generally (although no justice system is perfect). The people killed had stolen or killed or raped... and its their way so we just averted our eyes as we drove passed when we had to but we also knew the days to avoid the square. Other days it was a thriving souq.

Mostly you could choose between modern law (and it is practiced there) or traditional sharia law and both can be studied at university there and here. Modern law rulings can be far more severe than the sharia law equivalent and so many people choose sharia. Also its worth noting that the prison's there are not the best. People who were caught stealing for example would usually choose sharia law and loose a hand but be done in a day... than spend a year or two in prison... again... their way and its best not to cast judgements.

I don't know the full ins and outs of the case other than the lnik you posted... but she was convicted of witchcraft not being a witch. There is a difference. When I was there I was a catholic and there was no problem with that, but if I practiced it I was in for some serious trouble. So no mass or churches. Even I knew that.
Now if this lady knew all the above, and I assume far more!! Then she knew the risks that went with practicing what the matawa consider witchcraft and obviously decided the risk was worth the reward and she lost out on the gamble... is it fair... its not for me to judge, obviously she thought it worthwhile.

Furthermore there is the semantic issue of what exactly a witch is? Well I know of a few? The pagen sort of ones, who claim to do the very same... to heal people with many varied remidies. Perhaps they believe in mother earth and the like. These people perhaps would be better off not going to Saudi Arabia as their diety is the only one meant to do anything like that. But if they want to go, far game, and if they want to profit from it... good luck!!

I've heard of worse there!

Despite the really bad things like your link... its one of the most amazing places I've ever been as well as the saddest. But their deserts and moonscape!...WOW

exactly what i was going to say!!
she had options after all? really?
thats your take on this? SHE had a choice, and an option?
she was beheaded for witchcraft!
i guess if you are actually ridiculous enough to believe she actually WAS a witch,
i guess all this would make perfect sense. The problem here is: there is no such thing as witches.
is there? (bitches=yes but witches?)
"modern judicial system"? somehow i doubt that.
lol


is there?
 
Last edited:
ABC is so sensational its not funny... here is a great news agency run from teh safety of Qatar which regularily denounces actions in the house of saud and the government as well as other governments like bahrain etc.
They usually have a more balanced report...

Here they report here as a con person, who was said to cure any disease for $1000 (Riyal equilavelant). She was report to the ministry by the 'clients' she failed to cure. The death penalty like I mentioned above is only used for the most severe cases and considering this went to the supreme court on appeal I think there is a lot more to it than in reported, espcially in the likes of US media :mute

Gulf Times ? Qatar?s top-selling English daily newspaper - Gulf/Arab World
 
Their country and their laws..

Its not "their" laws in an undemocratic country where the general population does not have the ability to change or influence their own judicial system, part of which is based on a writings thousands of years old which cannot be criticised. Your attitude amazes me actually.

Personally I think state-sanctioned execution abhorrent in any form and certainly for a simple case of fraud (because lets face it witchcraft doesn't actually exist) The crime should have been punished far more lightly. Unfortunately Saudi Arabia has judges with far too much discretionary power, no jury, secret trials and a presumption of guilt. Despotism is the result
 
they need a revolution from the same people (cia) who brought us the debacle in egypt, lebanon , etc.

just arm the oppressed and let them take out their frustrations.
let the pendulum swing!
 
Last edited:
they need a revolution from the same people (cia) who brought us the debacle in egypt, lebanon , etc.

just arm the oppressed and let them take out their frustrations.
let the pendulum swing!

As much as a revolution would be welcomed there. There is too much politics involved there. Currently the US administration gives them increadible support, as their "arab" allies. Without US intervention a revolution would most likely already have occured there.

Yugyug.... you realise that saudi's have been voting certain area's for a very long time... Its a slow road, but they are walking down it!
My attitude in this thread is based on people with no idea of the delicate, social, religious and political balance there misquoting, articles that themselves portray a blurred account of things in the middle east. (Not meaning you JTKwest, there are a lot far worse people and accounts out there)
As a country I would consider it fairly backwards... but only cos I come from a far more progressive country... the average poeple from Saudi only need to look back to changes over the last 10 years and there are increadibly proud of the reform they are bringing...
Here is some recent developments
Women in Saudi Arabia get vote - The Irish Times - Mon, Sep 26, 2011

Thinking that they are all a desert dwelling bunch of idiots blindly following a crazy religious sect that hates america and the west is actually far from the truth. If it were why would so many people flock to the country itself to live and work from the US, or europe. For a nurse or teacher (female) there is always a heavy recruitment and its a top place for a expat female to work. Do you really think so many would travel and work there if it was really so backward? (and it actually is backward in some regards, I agree, but very progressive in others!!)

Personally I believe any form of execution is wrong... and it does seem extreme the case... but rather than the assumption that they are all extremeists... I quite believe there were maybe extenuating circumstances... how on earth can anyone second guess a judges decision (and they have to be trained in 2 legal systems, traditional and modern!) and a trial based on a solitary news article?
 
Last edited:
Well regardless of the personal comments on this thread I can't help but be a tad shocked that a Woman was beheaded for what ever reason!!!!!!!!!

We Guernsey folk love a bit of witch abuse too.:blackeye

As in other parts of Europe, Guernsey is seeped in legend and witchcraft was rife in the Middle Ages.
Guernsey convicted on average, one witch a year for 150 years and one Bailiff, the feared Amice de Carteret, was responsible for sending 35 women to their death in a thirty five year period up to 1635.

In 1640 a woman said to be 80 years old was burned at the stake.

The last witch trial in Guernsey was as recently as 1914, but the sentence (thankfully) was eight days hard labour, I would have to look up the actual offence but I think it was about an attempted poisoning.
 
Well regardless of the personal comments on this thread I can't help but be a tad shocked that a Woman was beheaded for what ever reason!!!!!!!!!

I'd agree, but I'd feel the same about a man being killed by lethal injection, also for whatever reason but frankly there is usually bent misinterpretations in media and public perception unfairly toward the middle east.

How about this angle.... the USA has one of the worst rate of executions in the world coming in third place behind Iran and china.... why on earth are USA executions not represented here (in the media or other forums) with outcry's?
US ranked third in Amnesty's axis of evil
Thousands Killed by Governments in US, Iraq and Communist China - Indymedia Ireland
Or even http://www.thejournal.ie/south-african-woman-executed-in-china-302793-Dec2011/

Not trying to justify the atrocities the saudi's do, but you don't have to look that far afield to find injustice...
And I'm maybe slightly bored so don't mind a good scrap :martial
 
Religion again it's the Bain of mankind war death ect yet we still look to it for guidance

And yes you can secound guess a judge for is he not a man ruled by emotions and irrational thoughts his upbringing his social structure so yes they to can be wrong even tho what they believe is right

Also is witchcraft bad or is it us lashing out at the unknown or for those who don't believe because there senses have never seen or had to interact with it so it gets disregarded man is still young and primitive and to me if a human is beheaded for being a witch it's no acceptable to me but as a murder or rapest pedophile ect yes execution I back

Just my 2 pence and sorry about the spelling and grammar I'm dyslexic and spell check can only do do much :)
 
Also is witchcraft bad
Technically (I think).... to preach "any" relegion (besides islam) comes under the defination of witchcraft there. So knowing this if I preached chatolicism there I could be done for witchcraft and beheaded. which begs the question... would I preach there? Probably not. I wouldn't even consider preaching here :)
I think its a lingual thing... witchcraft is just a Ba$tardized translation to english, but the actual defination in arabic is more complex. Certainly in their eyes, fraud would have been an important aspect and they had her under investigation for a very long time.

They sent in a female undercover agent apparantly "asking for her husband to be turned into an “unquestioning obedient man”." The lady complied and for a few thousand. Apparantly she was doing it outside of the kingdom as well...

Like I say, its not my cup of tea but the majority there widely accept sharia law... although the majority think a scaled down version would be better! Its what they want, and trying to force them to change by sending in the CIA or what not will make no difference. Look here...
[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia"]Sharia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

In fact shariah law has been introduced to other countries based on immigration... Britain is an example of this with the Muslim arbritration tribunual!
Islamic sharia courts in Britain are now 'legally binding' | Mail Online
And there is even talks of introcing certain aspects to ireland
Muslim Brotherhood leader talks of applying Sharia law - The Irish Times - Tue, Apr 19, 2011

For all the crap that goes with shariah law (such as beheading for witchcraft....) there are many positives. But again shariah is subjective so it can be intrepreted more liberally in some countries.

Shariah law has an AMAZING trade, interest and tax repurcussions. A percentage of EVERY penny that EVERY muslim earns should be given to a charitable source and shared with those less well off. Furthermore there is no concept of interest or unbalanced risk... the banks LEGALLY cannot screw you! Also any investments made must be good (so no investments made on arms, gunpowder factories, cigarette companies etc) sharia investments...
Its a very interesting model that is being adopted more and more in the west. In the UK and USA there has been an explosion in sharia banking and islamic banks with smaller individual banks and larger banks such as HSBC offereing sharia banking and the take up is not limited to muslims.
wikipedia said:
Trade

Islamic law recognizes private and community property, as well as overlapping forms of entitlement for charitable purposes, known as waqf or trusts. Under sharia law, however, ownership of all property ultimately rests with God; while individual property rights are upheld, there is a corresponding obligation to share, particularly with those in need.[84] The laws of contract and obligation are also formed around this egalitarian Quranic requirement, prohibiting unequal exchanges or unfair advantage in trade. On this basis, the charging of interest on loans is prohibited, as are other transactions in which risks are borne disproportionately to the potential returns between parties to a transaction. The limits on personal liability afforded by incorporation are seen as a form of usury in this sense, as is insurance. All these inequities in risk and reward between parties to a transaction, known collectively as riba, are prohibited.[85] For this reason, Islamic banking and financing are partnerships between customers and institutions, where risk and reward are distributed equitably. Partnerships, rather than corporations, are the key concept in collective Islamic business. Financing and investments are accomplished in this manner, as purchases and resales, with equity shifting over time between the institution and the client as payments are made or returns are recognized. Conversely, no individual is shielded from the consequences of poor judgement or bad timing.[86] The Islamic financial and investment models have taken root in the West and begun to flourish, even as the financial underpinnings of large Western corporations collapse under the weight of unevenly distributed risks.[87][88] Classic Islamic law details the manner of contracting, the types of transactions, the assignment of liability and reward, and the responsibilities of the parties in Islamic trade.[89]

There are lots of info on the web of sharia law, like it or not, you need to get into the mindset of these people, their ways and customs to properly understand it... and it make an objective arguement on it.
 
Last edited:
you are really reaching with all this bobdonny.
You make compelling arguments in their favor.
The problems with your arguments are that while the rest of us may not have your first hand experiences in the middle east , but we have some key facts that make us form our opinions of these people. And we are not wrong to believe that these people are being victimized by their leaders.
The stuff they do in those countries (run by religous fanatics)
really has nothing to do with the fact that they are muslim.In the middle ages the christians were running around cutting off heads and stuff too, but the point is, the rest of the world has moved beyond the middle ages and rightly so. It seems to me the problem here is that these people dont want to progress with the rest of us and are stuck in the middle ages and want to progress no further. All this crazy stuff they do with the beheadings and being scared of their womens sexuality (arab men have serious mom issues!!.)all sound familiar to me , thats because these are all the same things that all religous fanatics have been doing for ages, in all religeons.
Having laws against women voting. but then declaring that its ok - because they dont WANT to vote." Just ask them"
Having a law that they HAVE to wear a burqua or abaya-"but thats ok too- they WANT to wear them" !
really? then why do they EVER have to enforce it?
better yet, WHY HAVE THE LAW AT ALL?
we will let them get away with it for now-but they better not run out of oil!
 
Thanks :) But I am not arguing in their favor, they can come here and stand up and be accountable for their own actions. What I am doing is trying to suggest not everything we read in the media is clear cut and we need to take things with a grain of sand.

Some may be victimized by their leaders, but frankly this happens in most countries… you telling me no one gets screwed by their government in the US. We are constantly getting screwed here in Ireland!!

And the country is not run by religious fanatics… perhaps it suits them to have us believe that, but these are some very intelligent people running that country…most have been third level education (and higher) at USA or UK ivy league institutions. They understand one thing… money… Religious leaders cannot build up a country in terms of infrastructure, resources, employment, economy. Religious leaders cannot build anything besides cults or groups of fanatics. I wouldn’t blend them in the same argument.

And, what do you mean though by middle ages? I mean they have internet, satellite, money, some of the fanciest cars and bikes I have seen anywhere in the world as well as some of the most luxurious resorts (Dubai I know…but wow!! The Palm Trilogy ), theme parks and hotels and restaurants... They live in mansions and are mostly affluent… frankly I’d not be surprised if they came to the west, had a look around and though “we” were living in the middle ages.

You think beheading someone is from the middle ages… well I actually would agree with you there…
But I guarantee you “these people” are on their own internet forums, and sitting down for breakfast reading their own newspapers in shock and horror at other things in the world they consider barbaric and coming from the middle ages.
I suppose things like Guantanamo Bay… the denial of human rights and torture that went on there, lovely things like [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding"]Waterboarding - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame] . The americans actually hung Japanese soldiers for using this technique during WWII but yet used it themselves later and attempted (very badly) to justify it. That kind of policy…let alone technique is messed up!!!
Would you agree this is something that only fits in a world gone by? Middle ages perhaps? Should I have pity on you and other Americans because your leaders commit such atrocities? In the same manner you suggest they need a revolution, do Americans also? Have you you not been led by bible basher’s yourselves?

Anyway, who says they are scared of womens sexuality, that seems a bit absurd… maybe I’m missing something? As above, women are permitted to vote, same rights in that regard as men.
Yes they are compelled to wear the abaya, but most actually do want to wear them. Saudi women are very glamorous and some abaya’s can cost tens of thousands and be very ornately designed. If they did not want to wear them, why do you think they continue to wear them on holidays or even when resident in other countries? In fact there was uproar in France a few years ago when the French government tried to ban a similar artifacts from public schools… there was outcry and they reverted, even without a law these religious artefacts are deeply symbolic to the owners.

They enforce these things in a similar manner to all the other religions that “religiously” go to church every week to be told that they have sinned and preached to how to live a better life. That’s just who they are and what they do! Their religion is interwoven in their legal system and is Christianity in other countries. Not more than 20 years ago there were some horrific things been done by priests in the USA and Ireland (as well as other places). All covered up by the local community, respective governments and the religious administrations as well as the top brass in those orgs. It’s just a different type of twisted. What do you think people from Saudi think when they read or hear about that? The notion over there of what went on with our religious leaders is beyond contempt… and sometimes I wish we had sharia law ourselves to sort out those scum!

Laws govern society, we all need laws… but it should be up to us what laws we choose to live by. Maybe some do not agree with the laws in these countries, and they can leave if they like. Many more do agree but want slight changes. Like I said… they recently (this year) got women the vote, but they got that without the CIA, you or I helping them. Who are we to tell them what laws they should and should not follow. Are ours that perfect?
Also, who are we to preach human rights when we have such a bad track record ourselves!
It’s not always clear cut.

Finally… when the oil runs out???
They haven’t needed our help for a very long time, and they won’t need it either when the oil runs out!
https://crann.tcd.ie/assets/silicon republic_saudi arabian university kaust invests.pdf

:)
 
Thanks :) ?

Anyway, who says they are scared of womens sexuality, that seems a bit absurd… maybe I’m missing something? As above, women are permitted to vote, same rights in that regard as men.


Laws govern society, we all need laws… but it should be up to us what laws we choose to live by. Maybe some do not agree with the laws in these countries, and they can leave if they like.



really?

the women are forced to wear outfits that cover all but their eyes. its safe to say these guys have serious issues with women's sexuality
they also beat their women routinely and legally.
what would you say about a man who forces his women to cover up and beats her? in my country we put them in jail for that. sometimes its necessary for the government to step in and protect the weak.
The women are abused and legally stoned to death for adultery?
in their country, can the women just leave if they like? is that right?
also, you make big claims as to the women being allowed to vote.
didnt they just get that right less than a year ago?
so, we are praising them for joining the 1930's wow!!
as far as their big investments in silicon valley: its funny, they used to say the japanese were going to own most of the U.S. banks by the mid 90's
look at them now. (i'm not speaking japanese after all the predictions)
- things have a way of changing
when those arabs run out of oil..................
 
really? Yes

the women are forced to wear outfits that cover all but their eyes (this is not true). its safe to say these guys have serious issues with women's sexuality (Not true either)
they also beat their women routinely and legally (Not true either).
what would you say about a man who forces his women to cover up (as I say they some do that even outside of the country)and beats her (same as in any country)? in my country we put them in jail for that (in saudi a man would bw subject to retribution for that and they routinely get it). sometimes its necessary for the government to step in and protect the weak. (I agree - as does the saudi government in some instances)
The women are abused and legally stoned to death for adultery? (As are men...)
in their country, can the women just leave if they like? (Yes they are perfectly entitled to a divorce amongst other things like family courts - whats more they are recognised as the primary carer and are protected by the courts and automatically given protection of the children) is that right? (Sure is)
also, you make big claims as to the women being allowed to vote.
didnt they just get that right less than a year ago? (Yep I've refernced that fact 3 times already)
so, we are praising them for joining the 1930's wow!! (In some regards yes, in other regards they would think the same of us)
as far as their big investments in silicon valley: its funny, they used to say the japanese were going to own most of the U.S. banks by the mid 90's
look at them now. (i'm not speaking japanese after all the predictions)
- things have a way of changing
when those arabs run out of oil..................

No offence, but your arguments seem based on quite a few misunderstandings / mistruths... This is why I took devils advocate from the outset... I think we ALL need to better informed before we pass judgements...
 
  • Like
Reactions: apneaboy
As much as a revolution would be welcomed there. There is too much politics involved there. Currently the US administration gives them increadible support, as their "arab" allies.

You don't think this is the same in most countries? That there are masses of politics involved. Geez, even Saddam managed to pull politics out as a safe guard in the early 90's to survive the first Gulf War, and Gaddafi lasted so long because???

The US also gives massive support to Nth Korea by the way. Hence their ability to quell them without combat. It's control, not support at times.
 
keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.
defend those barbarians all you want , the truth is well known no matter what you say.these are ancient people who have been able to survive purely on luck- that they happen to be sitting on oil. If not for that, they would never get away with all the human rights abuses. its funny how your stories contradict everything i have ever heard or read on the region. i find it hard to believe that time magazine, along with all the major news and tv organizations, are all in a huge conspiracy to promote false info. ?
i find it much easier to believe that you are giving us some candy coated crap,
(if its true at all) than to believe all those news organizations are in a huge conspiracy to defame the arabs.
they just let the women vote mere months ago, yet i am to believe they are given equal rights under their laws? c'mon really now?
get real, you obviously have an agenda, and i aint buying your bull***** so if its for me, just save yourself the typing. with any luck, i will never go anywhere in that area of the world, so the truth is: i really dont care
mostly i just laugh at their stone age antics and will continue to do so.
the sky is blue, water is wet, zebras have stripes, and arab men have mommy issues
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonny250
i find it hard to believe that time magazine, along with all the major news and tv organizations, are all in a huge conspiracy to promote false info. ?
i find it much easier to believe that you are giving us some candy coated crap,

Good point, Fox for example, always have the facts....

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8bc_ZyORbM]Fox News vs Amsterdam - YouTube[/ame]
 
DeeperBlue.com - The Worlds Largest Community Dedicated To Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing

ABOUT US

ISSN 1469-865X | Copyright © 1996 - 2024 deeperblue.net limited.

DeeperBlue.com is the World's Largest Community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving, Ocean Advocacy and Diving Travel.

We've been dedicated to bringing you the freshest news, features and discussions from around the underwater world since 1996.

ADVERT