• Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:

    • Join over 44,280+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
    • Participate in and browse from over 516,210+ posts.
    • Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
    • Post your own photos or view from 7,441+ user submitted images.
    • All this and much more...

    You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!

The concept of holding the harpoon in the piston

Thread Status: Hello , There was no answer in this thread for more than 60 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.

Zahar

Well-Known Member
Jun 3, 2014
199
38
68
59
I have been using a 3mm shank and a 2.8mm hole in the piston for a long time! The holding force is excellent and allows you to safely download greenery! For a long time I tried to implement a hydraulic damper on the piston, but the piston did not work for a long time due to the hole in the piston nose, along which it was cut off! This idea changes the whole concept of pistons as consumables and makes it possible to quickly change the caprolon sleeve in the shank of the harpoon! Loading forces can be safely increased!
 

Attachments

  • Фиксация гарпуна в поршне!.jpg
    Фиксация гарпуна в поршне!.jpg
    114.3 KB · Views: 145
  • Haha
Reactions: tromic
I have been using a 3mm shank and a 2.8mm hole in the piston for a long time! The holding force is excellent and allows you to safely download greenery! For a long time I tried to implement a hydraulic damper on the piston, but the piston did not work for a long time due to the hole in the piston nose, along which it was cut off! This idea changes the whole concept of pistons as consumables and makes it possible to quickly change the caprolon sleeve in the shank of the harpoon! Loading forces can be safely increased!
The shaft tail is not hydrodynamic. The spear has a higher drag in water.
 
The shaft tail is not hydrodynamic. The spear has a higher drag in water.
This version is intended for Zelinkas that do not shoot at 8-10m underwater! Their distance is 1.5 - 3 m and the notorious hydrodynamic resistance plays a negligible role in comparison with the runner and line tied to the harpoon!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tromic
I have been using a 3mm shank and a 2.8mm hole in the piston for a long time! The holding force is excellent and allows you to safely download greenery! For a long time I tried to implement a hydraulic damper on the piston, but the piston did not work for a long time due to the hole in the piston nose, along which it was cut off! This idea changes the whole concept of pistons as consumables and makes it possible to quickly change the caprolon sleeve in the shank of the harpoon! Loading forces can be safely increased!
How can that shaft of 3 mm get into carpolon hole of 2,8 mm? Is there space for corpolon bushing to stretch radially?
 
How can that shaft of 3 mm get into carpolon hole of 2,8 mm? Is there space for corpolon bushing to stretch radially?
Tolerance of 0.2mm on thread M 6! When loading, the thread is sealed!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tromic
DeeperBlue.com - The Worlds Largest Community Dedicated To Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing

ABOUT US

ISSN 1469-865X | Copyright © 1996 - 2024 deeperblue.net limited.

DeeperBlue.com is the World's Largest Community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving, Ocean Advocacy and Diving Travel.

We've been dedicated to bringing you the freshest news, features and discussions from around the underwater world since 1996.

ADVERT