I have some good news and bad news for you. The good news is that here in the UK the number of Vegans has quadrupled in the last 5 years. Unfortunately the bad news is that it’s quadrupled to a pathetic 1.16% of the population.
I do not see a moral line drawn at veganism, I see a moral line drawn at the humane treatment of animals.
You seem very angry and you seem very angry with me personally. The problem is, people that think like me make up somewhere between 90 and 99% of the worlds population. So basically you’re pretty much angry with the entire human species. But hey, if blaming me for mankind makes you feel better, I’m happy to help.
I don't see a large number of people doing horrific things as justification for individuals doing horrible things. My moral compass is based on my own personal actions, that is all I can control. I am angry with you, in the same way that most people are angry when a child uploads a video of himself throwing a cat at the wall until it stops moving. I am not only at you, I am also angry at the society that has lead you to believe that your actions are moral acceptable (you said yourself that you do nothing evil).
Ironically, by being in such a tiny fringe group of people with feelings as extreme as yours, denouncing the actions of practically all of mankind, you’re actually far less likely to ever do anything that will lead to change or improvement. By wanting to live in a lovely, fluffy world, instead of accepting and dealing with reality, nobody will ever take you seriously
Again, my moral compass is set based on my actions, I do not see other people as being able to justify my behavior.
I’m not hiding from anything and I can prove how silly that argument is by simply turning it around. Would you not be just as guilty of refusing to acknowledge and discuss atrocious animal cruelty in China, simply because “we do bad things as well”? I’m capable of discussing both as a matter of fact. You aren’t.
I do not know what is more morally deplorable, raising an animal their whole life in a tiny cage, pumped full of hormones, infected, sometimes starving to death, or capturing a wild animal and cruely beating it to death. If however, we take your stance that one is worse than the other, it still absolutely does not make the other morally acceptable. A way to see this clearly is this, if someone kidnaps a kid and rips off all the fingers on their left hand and sets them free, their actions are not morally acceptable because someone else kidnapped a kid and ripped off all the fingers off both hands. One does not justify the other. I know you can see this. Furthermore, if a million people rip off the fingers of kids, it does not make it ok for any one of them to do this, it is still morally deplorable. Your argument of "lots of people do it, so it is ok" is absolute garbage, and I also believe that you know this.
I’m not trying to convince anybody of anything. I simply state facts and neither you or any other residents of fluffy world has even attempted to prove them wrong. Burning and boiling a dog alive is hideously and undisputedly worse than a one day old chick being killed in less than a second in a grinder. That is a scientifically proven fact. For anything you say to have the tiniest bit of credibility, you would need to start by accepting that fact or proving it wrong.
You have repeatedly tried to prove that your actions are "not evil", you have done this by saying lots of people do it, and that other people do worse things, amongst other extremely flimsy arguments. While it is true, that some animals are treated worse than others, the divide is not always between cultures, or east and west like you seem to want to cling. Furthermore, as I previously explained very clearly, even if there are other people who treat animals worse than you(and other typical western factory farm consumers), it does not absolve you of guilt.
Several years ago, I was very similar to you, trying desperately to convince people who do not use factory farms that it absolutely morally acceptable, it would often get me angry, I would feel my temperature rise, I wanted very much to be morally justified in my inhumane addiction. Eventually I found that it was a dead end, I could have one or the other, I could have juicy steaks on demand from restaurants, and choose whatever meat I wanted from supermarkets, or I could be at peace with the morality of my decisions, but I could not have both. I am confident that you also see this, the struggle that you are having is one of addiction than anything else. I know it is hard to give up things you like, but in the end it will make you stronger and increase your willpower in other areas of your life. I know you do not want to hear this, and you want so desperately to cling to your claim that treating animals horrifically is ok because other people do worse things or whatever, but this is not about you and other people, this is about you and the animals that you interact with via your financial decisions.