emm sorry xsaul
What's the difference between illegal and legal recreational drugs?
For me, the only difference is that the state can get some profit (taxes and inner production) from legal ones. If they see they cannot get profit, they illegalize them (check USA history about banning cocaine, heroin and marihuana). Then comes Europe and copy USA banned substances. Sorry for the off-topic, but was surprised but this sentence:
"I furiously DON'T believe in using recreational drugs--especially illegal ones"
BTW alcohol is the most hardcore drug, measured by the three objective drug factors: tolerance, security margin,abstinence.
It has a huge torelance factor (three beers today same effect as two beers a week ago) , a short security margin (double you usual intake and you can get an etylic comma) and hard abstinence syndrom (cold sweats,delirium,etc)
The known drug with the highest tolerance factor of all is nicotine. You can go from one cigarrette one day to a pack the week after.
Of course it's legal. USA is full of tobacco farms. Tobacco is taking more lifes away than AIDS and road crashes added. But who cares!! It makes our nations richer
and it made a whole legion of Humphrey Bogart-wanna-be look 'cooler'. BTW the adventurous Marlboro cowboy died from lung cancer.
Sorry for the off-topic, but was annoyed by reading that alcohol is ok as a drug compared to illegal ones. The 'illegal' factor is only a question of economic expansion. What a pity. This is our 'ethic' world. We have heroin junkies just because we do not profit for producing opiates derivatives in out countries and these junkies so are shooting 10% heroin with this LEGAL substances added: strichnine (SP?), chalk, anti-mosquito powder etc. Most of the addictive factor is because of the substances added (besides from the opiates addictive factor by itself). You know, the dealer wants to earn money from the poor stricnine addict
Well I thought all these things are well known world-wide, but I'm afraid (as I see) they aren't. I hardly recommend Andrew Weil's book 'From chocolate to Morphine'
about drugs.
Again, sorry for the off-topic
What's the difference between illegal and legal recreational drugs?
For me, the only difference is that the state can get some profit (taxes and inner production) from legal ones. If they see they cannot get profit, they illegalize them (check USA history about banning cocaine, heroin and marihuana). Then comes Europe and copy USA banned substances. Sorry for the off-topic, but was surprised but this sentence:
"I furiously DON'T believe in using recreational drugs--especially illegal ones"
BTW alcohol is the most hardcore drug, measured by the three objective drug factors: tolerance, security margin,abstinence.
It has a huge torelance factor (three beers today same effect as two beers a week ago) , a short security margin (double you usual intake and you can get an etylic comma) and hard abstinence syndrom (cold sweats,delirium,etc)
The known drug with the highest tolerance factor of all is nicotine. You can go from one cigarrette one day to a pack the week after.
Of course it's legal. USA is full of tobacco farms. Tobacco is taking more lifes away than AIDS and road crashes added. But who cares!! It makes our nations richer
and it made a whole legion of Humphrey Bogart-wanna-be look 'cooler'. BTW the adventurous Marlboro cowboy died from lung cancer.
Sorry for the off-topic, but was annoyed by reading that alcohol is ok as a drug compared to illegal ones. The 'illegal' factor is only a question of economic expansion. What a pity. This is our 'ethic' world. We have heroin junkies just because we do not profit for producing opiates derivatives in out countries and these junkies so are shooting 10% heroin with this LEGAL substances added: strichnine (SP?), chalk, anti-mosquito powder etc. Most of the addictive factor is because of the substances added (besides from the opiates addictive factor by itself). You know, the dealer wants to earn money from the poor stricnine addict
Well I thought all these things are well known world-wide, but I'm afraid (as I see) they aren't. I hardly recommend Andrew Weil's book 'From chocolate to Morphine'
about drugs.
Again, sorry for the off-topic
Last edited: