-
Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Join over 47,943+ fellow diving enthusiasts from around the world on this forum
- Participate in and browse from over 531,990+ posts.
- Communicate privately with other divers from around the world.
- Post your own photos or view from 7,455+ user submitted images.
- All this and much more...
You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
speedo´s or natural??
- Thread starter henjon
- Start date
Thread Status: Hello
, There was no answer in this thread for more than 90 days.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.
It can take a long time to get an up-to-date response or contact with relevant users.
Funny locker room story
A group of us were standing around talking in the locker room after waterpolo practice one day, discussing changing in front of each other. One girl, who had stripped completely, flung her suit in the air at one point and proclaimed "I love being naked!" At that moment, the coach's mother walked in on this charming scene. We all laughed, after the awkward silence
A group of us were standing around talking in the locker room after waterpolo practice one day, discussing changing in front of each other. One girl, who had stripped completely, flung her suit in the air at one point and proclaimed "I love being naked!" At that moment, the coach's mother walked in on this charming scene. We all laughed, after the awkward silence
While I was working near the ocean one summer, a guy was talking to me. I don't remember how the subject was broached, but he began to discuss the shower situation in the guys' dorm. He said that some of the guys had begun to shower together, first with speedos, then without. He went on for some time, naming names and talking about how this was such a good thing. At length, he asked me if similar things went on in the girls' dorms.
I paused a second then said "No...."
I paused a second then said "No...."
Speedos. Naively it never even occured to me that anyone would do otherwise! (But then my introduction to wetsuits was triathlon -- commando would make those speedy transitions tricky ... but no doubt entertaining!).
Also, whenever I change there always seems to be an old lady (or group of them) walking by who suddenly needs to sit down or stop for a break, or wait for a car, right next to me - it has happened maybe 5 or 6 times this last year; they're definitely hoping to sneak a peek IMO.:naughty
).Also, whenever I change there always seems to be an old lady (or group of them) walking by who suddenly needs to sit down or stop for a break, or wait for a car, right next to me - it has happened maybe 5 or 6 times this last year; they're definitely hoping to sneak a peek IMO.:naughty
Mr. X said:it has happened maybe 5 or 6 times this last year; they're definitely hoping to sneak a peek IMO.:naughty
really?? something worth looking at ? :chatup
I wear redgies (abreviated aus Rhyming Slang for redge Grundies = undies) or speedos often but also go naked sometimes especially in the morning when I forgot to put the jocks or speedos on when getting dressed while not very awake only diadvantages to going naked is sometimes hairs are caught in open cells and get pulled out 
or when you are getting changed in the carpark at the beach and a sweet little old lady is standing right next to you chatting about the fish and the weather when you want to change from the wetsuit to your street clothes.
or when you are getting changed in the carpark at the beach and a sweet little old lady is standing right next to you chatting about the fish and the weather when you want to change from the wetsuit to your street clothes.
poacher said:I wear redgies (abreviated aus Rhyming Slang for redge Grundies = undies) or speedos often but also go naked sometimes especially in the morning when I forgot to put the jocks or speedos on when getting dressed while not very awake only diadvantages to going naked is sometimes hairs are caught in open cells and get pulled out
that's one good reason for shaving off all your pubes
Not sure about giving myself a brazilian but going back to the spyhole thing, there's this story in the news at the mo about a perv at our uni.
Voyeurism is a crime in the USA?! How's then that all those paparazzi hunting naked pics of celebrities, and the readers of the magazines publishing their photos are not behind bars? Or why owners of the hotel chains who installed hidden cameras in their rooms do not face harsh sentences? I find that much more dangerous and offensive than a teenage taking a peek at girls in a shower.Pastor said:
I think that dragging this complexed kid through the courts is plain stupid and rude. He'd be much better and faster cured if he was obliged to buy a few therapy hours at a local prostitute.
As I replied to a friend in a private message, I suppose going commando in a lubed rubber suit WOULD focus attention away from the breath hold....especially when finning! But then, when it comes time to change, you may have a MESS to clean up as well. Heh heh....talk about REALLY enjoying the dive!
Todd
But then, when it comes time to change, you may have a MESS to clean up as well. Heh heh....talk about REALLY enjoying the dive!Todd
Nothing, just waiting a year or two more before web cams are being installed mandatory in every room, which is apparently coming to us anyway. They'll be cured "by default" then.Pastor said:
EDIT: and yes, if you want, I am politician in some way, because I hate almost all the politics I see, so I am certainly politically polarized. I find governments, police, and private agencies listening to our private communication as much intruding and deranging as if someone watched me naked in the shower. Hmm, frankly told, much more. I really could not take care less if someone watched me in my shower, but having to weight every my word not to trigger automated mechanism adding me then to no-flight lists is much more troublesome. Well, I have to admit, I am used to - I grew up in a totalitarian communist system, so there is finally nothing new now.
Last edited:
I am not sure if I understand you, Pastor. Can you explain me what is the difference if you are watched by a camera installed by a deranged boy and by a camera operator in a hotel room, and why one is a crime and the second not?!
And what's the difference between a boy intruding your privacy by watching you in a shower, and government agents intruding your privacy by watching your possibly intimate communication and mail? Why the first one is an offense and the second one apparently not?
And what is the difference between a boy installing a camera in showers and a paparazzi taking intimate or naked pictures of celebrities and then publishing them for millions of people to see. Why the boy has to suffer the trauma of a legal court (which will probably make him just more psychically deranged than he was) and the paparazzi, the publisher, and the readers are not prosecuted?! Can you explain that? Isn't that hypocrisy? Can you tell me why do you call me "weird"? Isn't it in the reality the society allowing such unjustice that is weird?
Do not take me wrong, I do not advocate voyeurism by private persons (nor by governments or reporters). I am just telling that the persecution was possibly completely unmeasured in this case. This is exactly what I meant by the hyperbole of "curing" the girls "by default" - if you are not a hypocrite, you have to admit that the authorities, media, and corporations invade more and more our private sphere, so being watched in privacy by someone without consent is becoming something completely "normal". Sarcastically exaggerating, I tried to tell that in a year or two, authorities and owners will have their web-cams installed in every shower and bathroom anyway, so that the girls better get used to the 1984 Orwellian world quick. This was not an attack on the girls, this was an attack on the society that does not use the same measure for all privacy offenders.
I cannot imagine haunting a teenage boy through courts for such a stupidity as taking a peek at a girl in shower, even if it was my daughter. I would definitely speak to him to show him that his behavior is unwelcome, or even slap him, but never would come to the idea bringing him to the police.
And what's the difference between a boy intruding your privacy by watching you in a shower, and government agents intruding your privacy by watching your possibly intimate communication and mail? Why the first one is an offense and the second one apparently not?
And what is the difference between a boy installing a camera in showers and a paparazzi taking intimate or naked pictures of celebrities and then publishing them for millions of people to see. Why the boy has to suffer the trauma of a legal court (which will probably make him just more psychically deranged than he was) and the paparazzi, the publisher, and the readers are not prosecuted?! Can you explain that? Isn't that hypocrisy? Can you tell me why do you call me "weird"? Isn't it in the reality the society allowing such unjustice that is weird?
Do not take me wrong, I do not advocate voyeurism by private persons (nor by governments or reporters). I am just telling that the persecution was possibly completely unmeasured in this case. This is exactly what I meant by the hyperbole of "curing" the girls "by default" - if you are not a hypocrite, you have to admit that the authorities, media, and corporations invade more and more our private sphere, so being watched in privacy by someone without consent is becoming something completely "normal". Sarcastically exaggerating, I tried to tell that in a year or two, authorities and owners will have their web-cams installed in every shower and bathroom anyway, so that the girls better get used to the 1984 Orwellian world quick. This was not an attack on the girls, this was an attack on the society that does not use the same measure for all privacy offenders.
I cannot imagine haunting a teenage boy through courts for such a stupidity as taking a peek at a girl in shower, even if it was my daughter. I would definitely speak to him to show him that his behavior is unwelcome, or even slap him, but never would come to the idea bringing him to the police.
Last edited:
Commando all the way!....just strategic towel placement whilst changing on the beach.
And yes i can confirm it is incredibly embarressing when your open cell splits right open in the crotch area when your 'au natruelle'
....and no amount of gaffer tape is going to fix the problem, so dont try!rofl
And yes i can confirm it is incredibly embarressing when your open cell splits right open in the crotch area when your 'au natruelle'
....and no amount of gaffer tape is going to fix the problem, so dont try!rofl
pelagicbeing said:Commando all the way!....just strategic towel placement whilst changing on the beach.
And yes i can confirm it is incredibly embarressing when your open cell splits right open in the crotch area when your 'au natruelle'
Crumbs, gaffer tape in that region could be like the world's worst bikini wax strips... :crutch