Well, with same kits in same category of guns could not be big difference in performance. It is all about physics.
Welcome to the DeeperBlue.com Forums, the largest online community dedicated to Freediving, Scuba Diving and Spearfishing. To gain full access to the DeeperBlue.com Forums you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
You can gain access to all this absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
Well, with same kits in same category of guns could not be big difference in performance. It is all about physics.
Only if I think someone's making a bad point... tromic's assumptions just appear a little baseless as he knows next to nothing about the gun.
Logically, if the One was less powerful, as the two guns use the same dry barrel system, the One would actually represent a devolution not an evolution.
Spag, I'm really not playing the fan-boy. It just seems that if a company redesigns their flagship product with an emphasis on power, gives it bigger air tanks (as I mentioned earlier and Pete just re-iterated) and generally tunes the gun up, it kind of logically follows that it will become more powerful, not, as tromic said earlier, less powerful.
I'm not personally concerned about having massive power, where I fish, it's no real benefit having a really powerful gun for hunting 3-4lb bass in low viz
I'm going to shut-up about this now until the sea tests
Bigger volume air tank gives more power as air pressure in the gun is more constant during the shot, i.e. a graph of the pressure change has a flatter gradient and the gun has a lower compression ratio.
Speargun compression ratio was discussed at length here in this thread: http://forums.deeperblue.com/pneumatic-spearguns/86054-pneumatic-speargun-compression-ratio.html. It explains the effect on power of having greater air tank capacity and what happens when you remove some of that capacity via a Hi/Lo power switch on the gun.