Last weekend I got a chance to spend some time in my friends BAT-30's.
They supplied a good kick when underwater and I really liked the way they dolphined much more than how they fluttered. On the surface they were fine if I went really slow. For faster surface swimming I thought that they were just too stiff, but this might have something to due with the lack of blade angle.
I should mention that even though the blades have no angles, the OMER foot pockets, that they were mounted in, do have an angle to them. As a result the overall, mounted, fin has a bit of an angle to it. I normally like a stiffer fin, my C4-40's are still my favorite, but with the BAT fins I would probably drop down to a 20.
One other fin that I have tried, and sold as soon as I could, was the Force Fin "freediving fin". This was their $495 wonder fin made out of their special "tan-delta" material and even had their patented " whisker" technology. I thought that I really could get a freediving fin that was short enough to fit into my carry-on bag, so I bought them.:duh Neeedless to say, THEY SUCKED!:head
To prove my point even further I let many people try them out while we played underwater hockey. The cheapest pair of $20 snorkleing fins worked better than they did. They were crappy for going to depth and I was lucky to get my cost back out of them- thank you E-bay!
They might "test" well when worn by some super-fat scuba diver, but they have no buisness calling them a "freediving fin".
Part of their problem is that they also suck for surface swimming. The fin's recovery stroke is so fast that your foot flies out of the water and you loose energy.
I would strongly suggest that no one on here ever wastes a dime on them. The best thing would be to use them for a very out of shape scuba diver to do laps around the pool in.
Live and learn.
jon