...There are only a handful of local spearfishermen in Pembrokeshire and a few tourist spearos so I don't think the loss of tourist revenue is going to be a good argument. Better angle is that there are so few doing it that the impact on fish stocks is miniscule.
Steve - for the moment, this issue hasn't arisen from a connection with wider issues. It was simply an afterthought as an extension to the proposal to ban flounder spiking.
...
Dave has pointed out that if BSAC support this proposal that it would logically be illegal for a diver to stab a flatfish!!!
I was confused by the last comment. If they were thinking of banning flounder spiking, how is that different from a diver stabbing a flat fish? It strikes me as bizarre to have one lot of fishermen trying to ban the activities of any other lot of fishermen, unless there is a significant impact on the environment/fish stocks. It might create a precedent we will all live to regret.
It would be easy to under estimate the tourist impact. I take part in a number of activities and take all my holidays in the UK, but almost all are planned around spearfishing. While weather conditions are often not favourable for spearing, I am happy to get the kayak, rod, climbing, walking or cycling gear out when conditions are bad. However, I wouldn't be there if spearing were banned (mainly because there are other areas and partly on principle). Nor would my family. Sometimes we travel with others, who also would not be there. We pay for accomodation, food, drink, tackle, petrol, parking, guides, beach stuff, postcards, use the local post office, cashpoint/bank, etc. - the brochures I get from the Welsh tourist board make me think they value that custom (if they don't, somebody else will).
BTW I am surprised at all the references to France, Italy and the EU as precedents. Jeez we've become a sad, sad nation. Spearing is far less popular here, the water is colder, cloudier, rougher & we tend not to kill an eat anything & everything, as they often do on the continent. Tank spearing must already be almost non-existant in the UK but I don't see that as justification to kill a minority activity. Talk about wasting tax payers money & red tape...
I don't see any need to ban flounder spiking if the only justification is because the spiker is standing up in two foot of water!
If you really want to protect fish stocks, trawlers are currently allowed to operate a quarter mile from the shore -- that is within easy swimming distance. How about keeping
all trawlers more than 2 miles from shore (still swimming distance)? [Just because getting such an EU-wide law like that through would be hard doesn't mean we should make silly token bans that effect half a dozen people and 2 dozen fish a year, that is in any case environmentally sustainable].