Same Ol', Same Ol'
As mentioned, I took the gun apart again (again, again), the rubber sleeve had moved rearwards on the pumping barrel exposing the first row of venting holes. Maybe from the air pushing it during use or perhaps during disassembly. I kinda hope it's the first because it would explain the latest failure
I then cut the countersinking and grooves for the sleeve a bit deeper to hopefully stop it from moving. But the wall thickness is "only" 1.5mm so that limits how deep I can go. The vent holes are still those oversized 1.5mm ones:
Then I assembled the gun again and took it up to about 27bar and so far it has survived four dry pre-loading cycles. I will do a few more during the day as I work on other stuff. And then if it still works, I may test it in the pool again. Probably against my Pathos 100 which is quite well tuned and the closest I have to a "known standard".
That said, in terms of power, even when I had to drop the pressure to ~21-22 bar in the first pool test a little while back, this gun had a lot more power than the bandgun though I didn't test the accuracy at the time. And that was even with dyneema shooting line which is more draggy than the mono on the Pathos
On Bulkhead Sizing and The Low Power Shot
Also, I want to test how much power it has on the low power setting. This is governed by the volume rear of the bulkhead so I can "adjust" that by how long I make the bulkhead. The downside of a more powerful low power shot in a Mirage system is that you need more pumping strokes before cocking and I actually thought that would be the case with the first alu bulkhead. But even with just 5 pumping strokes we are already down to ~7 bar. So, I could likely go bigger on the bulkhead volume/length, if needed. The downside of that, apart from an increase in weight, is that deeper features are a bit more tricky to machine, but the first bulkhead turned out pretty good and it's good practice for when I want to do a full handle later on.
Anyhow, I don't think I shared any "full body pics" of the gun fully assembled, yet:
On Sizing Conventions
In terms of size designation it gets complicated but if we chose the Sten as the standard, then the Mirages were actually a bit short for their size and the Predathors are actually a bit long. Back in the day, the longer of the two Mirage models was called a 100 (later on a 104). My gun (based on a Predathor 100) would be a Mirage 110/114.
(I am basing this on the lengths of the shooting barrels, I think that's the most fair)
A New Bulkhead In The Works
Spurrred on by Zahar's ideas and some of my own, I am thinking about making a new bulkhead. One that doesn't have the peg and the check valve for the pumping barrel built-in but simply has a smooth bore for a valve assembly to drop into (btw, there's no power regulator valve in these renderings):
On the next pic, disregard the finer workings of the valve and its size - it's just an older design I added for showing what I mean:
There are a few advantages with this approach:
As mentioned, I took the gun apart again (again, again), the rubber sleeve had moved rearwards on the pumping barrel exposing the first row of venting holes. Maybe from the air pushing it during use or perhaps during disassembly. I kinda hope it's the first because it would explain the latest failure
I then cut the countersinking and grooves for the sleeve a bit deeper to hopefully stop it from moving. But the wall thickness is "only" 1.5mm so that limits how deep I can go. The vent holes are still those oversized 1.5mm ones:
Then I assembled the gun again and took it up to about 27bar and so far it has survived four dry pre-loading cycles. I will do a few more during the day as I work on other stuff. And then if it still works, I may test it in the pool again. Probably against my Pathos 100 which is quite well tuned and the closest I have to a "known standard".
That said, in terms of power, even when I had to drop the pressure to ~21-22 bar in the first pool test a little while back, this gun had a lot more power than the bandgun though I didn't test the accuracy at the time. And that was even with dyneema shooting line which is more draggy than the mono on the Pathos
On Bulkhead Sizing and The Low Power Shot
Also, I want to test how much power it has on the low power setting. This is governed by the volume rear of the bulkhead so I can "adjust" that by how long I make the bulkhead. The downside of a more powerful low power shot in a Mirage system is that you need more pumping strokes before cocking and I actually thought that would be the case with the first alu bulkhead. But even with just 5 pumping strokes we are already down to ~7 bar. So, I could likely go bigger on the bulkhead volume/length, if needed. The downside of that, apart from an increase in weight, is that deeper features are a bit more tricky to machine, but the first bulkhead turned out pretty good and it's good practice for when I want to do a full handle later on.
Anyhow, I don't think I shared any "full body pics" of the gun fully assembled, yet:
On Sizing Conventions
In terms of size designation it gets complicated but if we chose the Sten as the standard, then the Mirages were actually a bit short for their size and the Predathors are actually a bit long. Back in the day, the longer of the two Mirage models was called a 100 (later on a 104). My gun (based on a Predathor 100) would be a Mirage 110/114.
(I am basing this on the lengths of the shooting barrels, I think that's the most fair)
A New Bulkhead In The Works
Spurrred on by Zahar's ideas and some of my own, I am thinking about making a new bulkhead. One that doesn't have the peg and the check valve for the pumping barrel built-in but simply has a smooth bore for a valve assembly to drop into (btw, there's no power regulator valve in these renderings):
On the next pic, disregard the finer workings of the valve and its size - it's just an older design I added for showing what I mean:
There are a few advantages with this approach:
- I can more easily test different valve designs, like Zahar's proposed mushroom type and the "o-ring valve", without having to make a new bulkhead for each change in the valve
- If I want to change to a pumping barrel with a different inner diameter, I only need to make a new valve, not a whole new bulkhead
- I can make the valves on the manual lathe which is often easier or on the CNC mill or on a combination of the two
- And finally, the bulkhead itself becomes less complicated and easier to machine on the CNC, though as mentioned the first one went quite well
Last edited: